User:Chunbum Park/Sub/Homeopathy research: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(more neutral)
imported>Chunbum Park
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


::I think these are reasonable considerations. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 02:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
::I think these are reasonable considerations. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 02:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
:::Thank you very much! I guess I'll continue this then.([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 18:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC))

Revision as of 13:44, 19 November 2008

  • "life energy," sometimes called a "vital force," which today is commonly referred to as a person's immune and defense system. - awkward grammar
  • Due to their respect for the wisdom of the body - ambiguous.... how can a body have "wisdom"?
  • small and specially prepared - unnecessary
  • Again, mainstream medicine rejects this premise as unsupported by adequate clinical evidence, molecular biology, or both. - why was this deleted?
  • when considering homeopathy as an intervention, but may be used to determine the need for more conventional approaches. vs are generally not essential for selecting a homeopathic remedy, but may be used for medical disease diagnosis. - I find the original sentence more descriptive & sensible. "medical diesase diagnosis" is ambiguous.
  • , which he feels will be more effective. - Why add this? Awkward grammar, incorrect gender; should be s/he, & it's confusing. I'm trying to figure out if it means anything substantial but I can't.


I think these are reasonable considerations. D. Matt Innis 02:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I guess I'll continue this then.(Chunbum Park 18:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC))