Cortical thickness/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+one)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+one)
Line 96: Line 96:
  | doi = 10.1002/hbm.20238
  | doi = 10.1002/hbm.20238
  | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16671080
  | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16671080
}}
*{{citation
| last1 = Kabani | first1 = N.
| last2 = Le Goualher | first2 = G.
| last3 = MacDonald | first3 = D.
| last4 = Evans | first4 = A.C.
| year = 2001
| title = Measurement of Cortical Thickness Using an Automated 3-D Algorithm: A Validation Study
| journal = Neuroimage
| volume = 13
| issue = 2
| pages = 375–380
| doi = 10.1006/nimg.2000.0652
| url = http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811900906529
}}
}}

Revision as of 00:11, 4 January 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A list of key readings about Cortical thickness.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Provides a reliability analysis of voxel-based MR morphometric data by comparing MR-based measures obtained from 11 healthy human volunteers, scanned twice (two weeks apart) with four different T1-weighted MP-RAGE pulse sequences.

"Reliability was extremely high for most measures and similar across imaging parameters. Significant measurement bias was observed, however, between MPR and all isotropic sequences for all cortical regions and some subcortical structures. These results suggest that these improvements in MRI acquisition technology do not compromise data reproducibility, but that consistency should be maintained in choosing imaging parameters for structural MRI studies."