Talk:Crash of 2008/Timelines: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards m (Talk:2007-2008 financial crisis/Timelines moved to Talk:Crash of 2008/Timelines: see Talk page) |
imported>Larry Sanger (→Format idea: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I have made a number of amendments designed to eliminate items of secondary relevance and make it easier to see the unfolding picture.-[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:58, 5 October 2008 (CDT) | I have made a number of amendments designed to eliminate items of secondary relevance and make it easier to see the unfolding picture.-[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:58, 5 October 2008 (CDT) | ||
== Format idea == | |||
I think it would be great to have two or even three columns in the timeline. The columns would match horizontally by decade, year, or (for recent events) month. The first column would have the most important events from around the world. The second column would have all the tedious details about the unfolding events ''in the U.S.'' The third column would have all the details ''everywhere else.'' How does that sound? Anybody game? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 13 October 2008
Fascinating, isn't it?
May you live in interesting times, indeed! --Larry Sanger 10:43, 23 September 2008 (CDT)
Scary-fascinating like a horror movie!
I recognise the Chinese curse - and I do fear that I may yet need to extend the timeline and change the title. I do hope not, and that all that will need to be added next year will be the results of the FBI's investigations. Fingers crossed!- Nick Gardner 03:09, 24 September 2008 (CDT)
Simplifying amendments
I have made a number of amendments designed to eliminate items of secondary relevance and make it easier to see the unfolding picture.-Nick Gardner 09:58, 5 October 2008 (CDT)
Format idea
I think it would be great to have two or even three columns in the timeline. The columns would match horizontally by decade, year, or (for recent events) month. The first column would have the most important events from around the world. The second column would have all the tedious details about the unfolding events in the U.S. The third column would have all the details everywhere else. How does that sound? Anybody game? --Larry Sanger 20:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)