Talk:Australia, history: Difference between revisions
imported>David H. Barrett (New page: {{subpages}} I've categorised this as a stub, given that it's really just a copy and paste from the main Australia article. (And if that's a bit naughty, please let me know and I'll s...) |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:David H. Barrett|David H. Barrett]] | [[User:David H. Barrett|David H. Barrett]] | ||
It should be classed as a developing article: stubs are very very short. If it is already included in the Australia article, why do we need a separate article? I would be more inclined to cut the substantial text from the Australia article (replacing it with a synopsis) and put a subpage History in the cluster there. It is better to avoid titles like "X. history" or "Y, geography" although they are permitted on CZ.[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 00:51, 20 August 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 19 August 2008
|
| Metadata here |
I've categorised this as a stub, given that it's really just a copy and paste from the main Australia article. (And if that's a bit naughty, please let me know and I'll set about fixing it!)
There's heaps of work to be done on this, obviously, but I felt it was probably a good idea to get something in here that others (and I) can work on.
Come on Aussies and Aussie-philes! Let's get stuck in!
It should be classed as a developing article: stubs are very very short. If it is already included in the Australia article, why do we need a separate article? I would be more inclined to cut the substantial text from the Australia article (replacing it with a synopsis) and put a subpage History in the cluster there. It is better to avoid titles like "X. history" or "Y, geography" although they are permitted on CZ.Martin Baldwin-Edwards 00:51, 20 August 2008 (CDT)