Talk:Cipher: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Again, an unwarranted deletion of a citation: new section) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I cited, under [[Talk:One-time_pad]] some research that might suggest that it may be possible to generate pseudorandom sequences that are unpredictable, but I would want to spend a few hours on those proofs. There is no reason whatsoever for deleting the Knuth citation. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:08, 2 August 2008 (CDT) | I cited, under [[Talk:One-time_pad]] some research that might suggest that it may be possible to generate pseudorandom sequences that are unpredictable, but I would want to spend a few hours on those proofs. There is no reason whatsoever for deleting the Knuth citation. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:08, 2 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
== Again, an unwarranted deletion of a citation == | |||
Since I wrote the [[Venona]] article, I believe I know what is in it. If, therefore, I believed that it was useful to wikilink to it, rather than having the direct citation in the references for this article, I would have done so. I did not. Sandy Berger has not explained the second deletion of a relevant citation. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:20, 2 August 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:20, 2 August 2008
Constable help needed for unwarranted deletion of reference
Since I wrote some of the article, I may not be able to speak as a neutral editor, but I can see absolutely no justification for removing a citation, from one of the most authoritative textbooks in computer science, from the commentary about the need to generate random numbers by non-numeric means.
I cited, under Talk:One-time_pad some research that might suggest that it may be possible to generate pseudorandom sequences that are unpredictable, but I would want to spend a few hours on those proofs. There is no reason whatsoever for deleting the Knuth citation. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:08, 2 August 2008 (CDT)
Again, an unwarranted deletion of a citation
Since I wrote the Venona article, I believe I know what is in it. If, therefore, I believed that it was useful to wikilink to it, rather than having the direct citation in the references for this article, I would have done so. I did not. Sandy Berger has not explained the second deletion of a relevant citation. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:20, 2 August 2008 (CDT)