Talk:Adaptive learning: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chad Jackson
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Adaptive testing as well? ==
This is an interesting subject. You might want to consider adaptive testing; I've worked with developers for it but unfortunately can't give you any immediate links.
This was in adult learning and industry technical certfication. The idea was to avoid unfairly penalizing a student if, for example, one question were asked on a particular topic, and the question were poorly worded, or for some reason wasn't clear to that learner.  If the initial question in an area were answered  correctly, the test engine would move to the next topic.
If the question were missed, and sometimes the question was deliberately advanced and possibly testing more than one concept, the test engine would ask an alternative question, still a legitimate challenge but to give the student another chance to demonstrate understanding. If the question was one that required understanding of multiple topics, the test engine would be sure to ask one that applied only to a single topic.
It wasn't extremely hard to implement: the question database had each question keyed with the topics it addressed. This also let us use the same question database for different testing requirements: if certification A required a demonstration of knowledge of subjects 1, 1.2, and 4, while certification B wanted to check knowledge is areas 1 and 5, they could both pull from the pool of category 1 questions. 1.2, in this example, would be a more specialized subset of subject 1. 
By having a minimum of 3-5 questions on each topic, which the test engine might pick in random sequence, it made it impossible to cheat by memorizing an answer sheet.
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:01, 25 July 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:01, 25 July 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Adaptive learning is an educational method which enables computers to be used as teaching devices and adapt to their subjects' needs. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Computers, Education and Psychology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Adaptive testing as well?

This is an interesting subject. You might want to consider adaptive testing; I've worked with developers for it but unfortunately can't give you any immediate links.

This was in adult learning and industry technical certfication. The idea was to avoid unfairly penalizing a student if, for example, one question were asked on a particular topic, and the question were poorly worded, or for some reason wasn't clear to that learner. If the initial question in an area were answered correctly, the test engine would move to the next topic.

If the question were missed, and sometimes the question was deliberately advanced and possibly testing more than one concept, the test engine would ask an alternative question, still a legitimate challenge but to give the student another chance to demonstrate understanding. If the question was one that required understanding of multiple topics, the test engine would be sure to ask one that applied only to a single topic.

It wasn't extremely hard to implement: the question database had each question keyed with the topics it addressed. This also let us use the same question database for different testing requirements: if certification A required a demonstration of knowledge of subjects 1, 1.2, and 4, while certification B wanted to check knowledge is areas 1 and 5, they could both pull from the pool of category 1 questions. 1.2, in this example, would be a more specialized subset of subject 1.

By having a minimum of 3-5 questions on each topic, which the test engine might pick in random sequence, it made it impossible to cheat by memorizing an answer sheet.

Howard C. Berkowitz 14:01, 25 July 2008 (CDT)