Artificial respiration: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
===Noninvasive===
===Noninvasive===
According to the U.S. [[National Library of Medicine]], the terms for the types of nonvinvasive ventilation are:
According to the U.S. [[National Library of Medicine]], the terms for the types of nonvinvasive ventilation are:
*[[Continuous positive airway pressure]] (CPAP). CPAP may help [[respiratory insufficiency]] due to [[heart failure]].<ref name="pmid9792593">{{cite journal |author=Pang D, Keenan SP, Cook DJ, Sibbald WJ |title=The effect of positive pressure airway support on mortality and the need for intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review |journal=Chest |volume=114 |issue=4 |pages=1185–92 |year=1998 |month=October |pmid=9792593 |doi= |url=http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9792593 |issn=}}</ref>
*[[Continuous positive airway pressure]] (CPAP).
**Bilevel positive airway pressure (bilevel PAP)
** Bilevel positive airway pressure (bilevel PAP).
*[[Intermittent positive-pressure breathing]] (IPPB or NIPPB or called pressure support).  IPPB may help [[respiratory insufficiency]] due to [[chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]<ref name="pmid15222912">{{cite journal |author=Hess DR |title=The evidence for noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the care of patients in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review of the literature |journal=Respir Care |volume=49 |issue=7 |pages=810–29 |year=2004 |month=July |pmid=15222912 |doi= |url=http://www.rcjournal.com/contents/07.04/07.04.0810.pdf |issn=}}</ref>, especially if the exacerbations are severe<ref name="pmid12779296">{{cite journal |author=Keenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS |title=Which patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease benefit from noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation? A systematic review of the literature |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=138 |issue=11 |pages=861–70 |year=2003 |month=June |pmid=12779296 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12779296 |issn=}}</ref>.
*[[Intermittent positive-pressure breathing]] (IPPB or NIPPB or called pressure support).


====Inconsistent terminology====
====Inconsistent terminology====
Line 19: Line 19:
==Effectiveness==
==Effectiveness==
===Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease===
===Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease===
===Health failure===
All types of noninvasive ventilation studied through 2003 may help [[respiratory insufficiency]] due to [[chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]<ref name="pmid15222912">{{cite journal |author=Hess DR |title=The evidence for noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the care of patients in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review of the literature |journal=Respir Care |volume=49 |issue=7 |pages=810–29 |year=2004 |month=July |pmid=15222912 |doi= |url=http://www.rcjournal.com/contents/07.04/07.04.0810.pdf |issn=}}</ref>, especially if the exacerbations are severe<ref name="pmid12779296">{{cite journal |author=Keenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS |title=Which patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease benefit from noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation? A systematic review of the literature |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=138 |issue=11 |pages=861–70 |year=2003 |month=June |pmid=12779296 |doi= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12779296 |issn=}}</ref>.
In a [[randomized controlled trial]] of [[respiratory insufficiency]] due to [[heart failure]], neither CPAP or bilevel PAP reduced mortality as compared to standard oxygen therapy; however, both of the noninvasive methods provided similar symptomatic and metabolic improvement.<ref name="pmid18614781">{{cite journal |author=Gray A, Goodacre S, Newby DE, Masson M, Sampson F, Nicholl J |title=Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=359 |issue=2 |pages=142–51 |year=2008 |month=July |pmid=18614781 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0707992 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=18614781&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref> In this trial CPAP was started at 5 cm of water and<sup> </sup>increased as needed to 15 cm of water. Bilevel PAP was started<sup> </sup>at an inspiratory positive airway pressure of 8 cm of water<sup> </sup>and an expiratory positive airway pressure of 4 cm of water<sup> </sup>and was increased as needed to an inspiratory pressure of 20 cm<sup> </sup>of water and expiratory pressure of 10 cm of water.<ref name="pmid18614781"/>
 
===Heart failure===
Noninvasive ventilation may help treat [[respiratory insufficiency]] due to [[heart failure]], but the optimal mode of noninvasive ventilation is not clear. A [[systematic review]] found that CPAP may be better than bilevel PAP.<ref name="pmid9792593">{{cite journal |author=Pang D, Keenan SP, Cook DJ, Sibbald WJ |title=The effect of positive pressure airway support on mortality and the need for intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review |journal=Chest |volume=114 |issue=4 |pages=1185–92 |year=1998 |month=October |pmid=9792593 |doi= |url=http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9792593 |issn=}}</ref> However, in a more recent [[randomized controlled trial]] of [[respiratory insufficiency]] due to [[heart failure]], neither CPAP or bilevel PAP reduced mortality as compared to standard oxygen therapy; however, both of the noninvasive methods provided similar symptomatic and metabolic improvement.<ref name="pmid18614781">{{cite journal |author=Gray A, Goodacre S, Newby DE, Masson M, Sampson F, Nicholl J |title=Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=359 |issue=2 |pages=142–51 |year=2008 |month=July |pmid=18614781 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0707992 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=18614781&promo=ONFLNS19 |issn=}}</ref> In this trial CPAP was started at 5 cm of water and<sup> </sup>increased as needed to 15 cm of water. Bilevel PAP was started<sup> </sup>at an inspiratory positive airway pressure of 8 cm of water<sup> </sup>and an expiratory positive airway pressure of 4 cm of water<sup> </sup>and was increased as needed to an inspiratory pressure of 20 cm<sup> </sup>of water and expiratory pressure of 10 cm of water.<ref name="pmid18614781"/>


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 12:46, 14 July 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In medicine, artificial respiration is "Any method of artificial breathing that employs mechanical or non-mechanical means to force the air into and out of the lungs. Artificial respiration or ventilation is used in individuals who have stopped breathing or have respiratory insufficiency to increase their intake of oxygen (O2) and excretion of carbon dioxide (CO2)."[1]

Classification

Using intratracheal intubation

  • PEEP

Noninvasive

According to the U.S. National Library of Medicine, the terms for the types of nonvinvasive ventilation are:

Inconsistent terminology

The terminology for noninvasive respiratory support is inconsistently used in the medical literature.

  • Some authors interchange IPPB with IPPV. B indicates the patient is spontaneously breathing while V indicates ventilation via intratracheal intubation.
  • Some authors interchange IPPB and IPPV with bilevel PAP as done in a recent randomized controlled trial.[2]
  • Some authors interchange bilevel PAP with BiPAP. The latter is a specific brand of a bilevel PAP ventilator.

Effectiveness

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

All types of noninvasive ventilation studied through 2003 may help respiratory insufficiency due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[3], especially if the exacerbations are severe[4].

Heart failure

Noninvasive ventilation may help treat respiratory insufficiency due to heart failure, but the optimal mode of noninvasive ventilation is not clear. A systematic review found that CPAP may be better than bilevel PAP.[5] However, in a more recent randomized controlled trial of respiratory insufficiency due to heart failure, neither CPAP or bilevel PAP reduced mortality as compared to standard oxygen therapy; however, both of the noninvasive methods provided similar symptomatic and metabolic improvement.[2] In this trial CPAP was started at 5 cm of water and increased as needed to 15 cm of water. Bilevel PAP was started at an inspiratory positive airway pressure of 8 cm of water and an expiratory positive airway pressure of 4 cm of water and was increased as needed to an inspiratory pressure of 20 cm of water and expiratory pressure of 10 cm of water.[2]

References