Substance (philosophy): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas Ash (Created article) |
imported>Thomas Ash No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
In philosophy, a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did. | In philosophy, a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did. For example, it is commonly thought that a property like redness could not exist if there were not also some ''thing'' which was red, and hence properties are distinguished from substances, and substances are often thought of as the things which bear properties. | ||
The notion of substance has been the subject of considerable debate in philosophy, and some consider it suspect. It is sometimes rejected altogether by modern, scientifically-inspired metaphysics, which substitutes the notions of fields or processes as fundamental. | |||
Revision as of 06:55, 29 May 2008
In philosophy, a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did. For example, it is commonly thought that a property like redness could not exist if there were not also some thing which was red, and hence properties are distinguished from substances, and substances are often thought of as the things which bear properties.
The notion of substance has been the subject of considerable debate in philosophy, and some consider it suspect. It is sometimes rejected altogether by modern, scientifically-inspired metaphysics, which substitutes the notions of fields or processes as fundamental.