Written language: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson m (update image code) |
imported>John Stephenson (→Spoken versus written language in linguistics: moraic, rather than syllabic) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Spoken versus written language in linguistics== | ==Spoken versus written language in linguistics== | ||
When examining language that may be spoken or written, [[linguistics|linguists]] generally consider that more fundamental insights can be gleaned into the nature of language by analysing natural, spontaneous speech, whereas the written word is considered at best an incomplete representation of a linguistic system. One reason for this is the fact that written language usually develops as a way to record spoken language rather than as a separate system. Another point is that children [[language acquisition|acquire]] their first language(s) through speech or signing, and never solely through writing; a focus on written language therefore ignores linguistic development prior to [[literacy]]. Another reason is that [[writing system]]s typically ignore many features of spoken language - for example, the [[English language|English]] [[alphabet]] does not show [[stress (linguistics)|stress]] (''rebel'', out of [[context]], could be the [[verb]] or the [[noun]]), and the [[Japanese language|Japanese]] [[ | When examining language that may be spoken or written, [[linguistics|linguists]] generally consider that more fundamental insights can be gleaned into the nature of language by analysing natural, spontaneous speech, whereas the written word is considered at best an incomplete representation of a linguistic system. One reason for this is the fact that written language usually develops as a way to record spoken language rather than as a separate system. Another point is that children [[language acquisition|acquire]] their first language(s) through speech or signing, and never solely through writing; a focus on written language therefore ignores linguistic development prior to [[literacy]]. Another reason is that [[writing system]]s typically ignore many features of spoken language - for example, the [[English language|English]] [[alphabet]] does not show [[stress (linguistics)|stress]] (''rebel'', out of [[context]], could be the [[verb]] or the [[noun]]), and the [[Japanese language|Japanese]] [[mora]] system does not record [[pitch accent languages|pitch accent]].<ref>For example, ''hashi'', written はし for ''ha'' and ''shi'' in ''[[hiragana]]'', can mean 'chopsticks' or 'bridge'. The [[pitch]] contour of the [[voice]] over the two [[syllable]]s leads to different [[pronunciation]] in many varieties of Japanese, including the standard form. In writing, the only way to show the difference outside of context is to use ''[[kanji]]'' (Chinese-derived [[Chinese characters|characters]]) - 橋 is 'bridge' and 箸 is 'chopsticks'. With another word following, a ''third'' meaning is possible: 'edge' (端).</ref> | ||
==Footnotes== | ==Footnotes== | ||
Revision as of 13:09, 12 February 2021
Written language is a way of recording language using any of various instruments and material, such as pen and paper, chisel and stone, or computers. The language itself is either spoken or signed, so written language develops as a way of representing what has been said. In many cultures, community languages are unwritten (such as Pirahã in Brazil).
There are several writing systems in use around the world, which record different elements of the languages they record. A syllabary, for example, assigns a symbol to each significant syllable of the language, while an alphabet records individual phonemes. Other systems involve symbols that usually incorporate meaning, such as Chinese characters. The decision over which system to use can be purely political or historical in nature, or there can be arguments that one system is better suited to the nature of a particular language. Over time, a system can change from representing one kind of linguistic unit to another - for example, the Latin alphabet emerged over the centuries via several other systems, ultimately descended from Egyptian hieroglyphs, which recorded meaning rather than anything like the present-day sounds of languages this alphabet has been adapted for, such as English.
Spoken versus written language in linguistics
When examining language that may be spoken or written, linguists generally consider that more fundamental insights can be gleaned into the nature of language by analysing natural, spontaneous speech, whereas the written word is considered at best an incomplete representation of a linguistic system. One reason for this is the fact that written language usually develops as a way to record spoken language rather than as a separate system. Another point is that children acquire their first language(s) through speech or signing, and never solely through writing; a focus on written language therefore ignores linguistic development prior to literacy. Another reason is that writing systems typically ignore many features of spoken language - for example, the English alphabet does not show stress (rebel, out of context, could be the verb or the noun), and the Japanese mora system does not record pitch accent.[1]
Footnotes
- ↑ For example, hashi, written はし for ha and shi in hiragana, can mean 'chopsticks' or 'bridge'. The pitch contour of the voice over the two syllables leads to different pronunciation in many varieties of Japanese, including the standard form. In writing, the only way to show the difference outside of context is to use kanji (Chinese-derived characters) - 橋 is 'bridge' and 箸 is 'chopsticks'. With another word following, a third meaning is possible: 'edge' (端).