National Reconnaissance Office: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
  | editor = Richelson, Jeffrey  
  | editor = Richelson, Jeffrey  
  | url = http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB35/02-01.htm
  | url = http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB35/02-01.htm
  | date = v }}</ref>
  | date = 20 July 1961 }}</ref>
*Program A: Air Force [[imagery intelligence]], initially wide coverage
*Program A: Air Force [[imagery intelligence]], initially wide coverage
*Program B: CIA [[imagery intelligence]], initially high resolution  
*Program B: CIA [[imagery intelligence]], initially high resolution  
Line 45: Line 45:
===Subsequent functional reorganization===
===Subsequent functional reorganization===
Eventually, the lettered programs were dropped, and offices created for the main types of technical collection (SIGINT and IMINT), space launch, ground systems, and advanced research & development.
Eventually, the lettered programs were dropped, and offices created for the main types of technical collection (SIGINT and IMINT), space launch, ground systems, and advanced research & development.
There were fine-grained technical distinctions, but based on function, not sponsor. For example, the NRO Strategic Plan breaks SIGINT into COMINT, tactical ELINT, and national ELINT. <ref name=NSAEBB35-20>{{citation
| title = The NRO Declassified
| author = Faga, Martin C.
| contribution = NRO Strategic Plan
| volume = National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 225
| editor = Richelson, Jeffrey
| url = http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB35/20.htm
| date = 18 January 1993  }}</ref>


==Extreme sensitivitity of programs==
==Extreme sensitivitity of programs==
Line 69: Line 78:
   | url = http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB231/doc41.pdf
   | url = http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB231/doc41.pdf
}}</REF>.
}}</REF>.
==Additional generations of NRO platforms==
==Later generations of NRO platforms==
===Imagery===
===Imagery===
US programs are most commonly known by a designation in the numbered KH (for KEYHOLE) series. The code words for the specific satellites are tightly held.
US programs are most commonly known by a designation in the numbered KH (for KEYHOLE) series. The code words for the specific satellites are tightly held.
Line 75: Line 84:
The latest generation has been called either KH-14 or Advanced KH-13.
The latest generation has been called either KH-14 or Advanced KH-13.
===SIGINT===
===SIGINT===
US SIGINT satellites have included the CANYON series [[Rhyolite/Aquacade]] series,  succeeded by the [[Magnum (satellite)|Vortex/Magnum/Orion]] and [[Mentor (satellite)|Mentor]]. Where the preceding satellites were in close to geosynchronous orbit, JUMPSEAT/TRUMPET satellites were in Moliyna orbits giving better polar coverage. <ref name=TalinnPSI>{{citation
US SIGINT satellites have included the CANYON series [[Rhyolite/Aquacade]] series,  succeeded by the [[Magnum (satellite)|Vortex/Magnum/Orion]] and [[Mentor (satellite)|Mentor]]. Where the preceding satellites were in close to geosynchronous orbit, JUMPSEAT/TRUMPET satellites were in [[satellite orbits#highly elliptical orbit|Moliyna]] orbits giving better polar coverage. <ref name=TalinnPSI>{{citation
   | title =  Submarine cable interception
   | title =  Submarine cable interception
   | work = Political and Social Issues in Digital Interactive Media: Lecture 4 - the Big Brother on Menwith Hill
   | work = Political and Social Issues in Digital Interactive Media: Lecture 4 - the Big Brother on Menwith Hill
Line 98: Line 107:
  | url = http://jya.com/usic08.htm
  | url = http://jya.com/usic08.htm
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
==Future Generation Technology==
Memorandum for Director of Central Intelligence
Subject: Small Satellite Review Panel
Unclassified
July 1996
==References==
==References==
{{reflist | 2}}
{{reflist | 2}}

Revision as of 19:07, 18 May 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A member agency of the United States intelligence communiity (IC) and administratively a part of the United States Department of Defense, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is responsible for the design, procurement, launch, and operation of U.S. airborne reconnaissance platforms, including satellites, as well as some unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and reconnaissance aircraft. NRO receives the raw output from these platforms, but the output is analyzed by other members of the IC, principally:

History and Organization

After the May 1960 shootdown of a U-2 reconnaissance aircraft over the Soviet Union, a program which, under the code name AQUATONE, had provided immensely valuable imagery intelligence, the United States was concerned about the vulnerability of even high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft such as the U-2. As early as 946, there had been studies of reconnaissance satellites, and an Air Force requirement was issue in 1955, before the first launch of any type of satellite, the Soviet Sputnik, in 1957.

After delays in an Air Force program, the Central Intelligence Agency was authorized, in 1958, to develop the first photoreconnaissance satellite, the CORONA satellite. Launched in 1960, the first working intelligence satellite was a Navy program, with an overt scientific mission for the GRAB satellite, but that carried, as well, an electronic intelligence payload, Tattletale. Also in 1960, also under an overt scientific mission for the Air Force called the DISCOVERER satellite, the actual payload was CORONA, which took pictures of large areas but without fine detail. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, also in 1960, authorized the Air Force to begin developing the high-resolution GAMBIT satellite. [1] Each of the programs was run by the sponsoring organization, the CIA, Air Force, or Navy, with the only cooperation in use of military space launch facilities.

There were significant technical problems in these CIA and Air Force programs, as well as another Air Force program for the SAMOS satellite. SAMOS had not yet been launched. While an initial White House review assigned the latter project to a subcabinet-level Air Force organization, by 1961, the National Reconnaissance Program (NRP) was being proposed, with the very phrase NRP being classified as TOP SECRET. On 20 July 1961, the NRO was established by a classified directive; the name NRO was classified SECRET. [2] NRO was to be jointly managed by the Air Force and CIA, with Joseph Charyk, with the overt title of Under Secretary of the Air Force, to be its first Director.

The National Photointerpretation Center (NPIC), a separate organization, under the CIA Directorate of Science and Technology but with substantial military staff, analyzed the output of reconnaissance photographs, both from satellites and the U-2. NPIC was headed by Arthur Lundahl, often regarded as the father of U.S. photointerpretation. NPIC was not part of NRO, but of CIA.

Disclosure of the existence of NRO was not seriously discussed until 1992, although the general existence of the programs were not acknowledged, but widely known among defense personnel and contractors, by the late 1960s. Nevertheless, full announcement of the agency took place in 1994, with most details still highly classified. NRO's launch and operations were sensitive compartmented information (SCI, a extra control beyond the regular clasification of intelligence), and in the BYEMAN control system. The images and their interpretation, however, were under a separate SCI codeword, TALENT-KEYHOLE control system.

Original Service-Dependent Structure

For many years, the NRO kept the prior programs in separate organizational units:[2]

Current (2008) NRO Organization

There were NRO staff for aircraft and space platforms. Eventually, a Program D covered aircraft systems such as the U-2 and SR-71.

Subsequent functional reorganization

Eventually, the lettered programs were dropped, and offices created for the main types of technical collection (SIGINT and IMINT), space launch, ground systems, and advanced research & development.

There were fine-grained technical distinctions, but based on function, not sponsor. For example, the NRO Strategic Plan breaks SIGINT into COMINT, tactical ELINT, and national ELINT. [3]

Extreme sensitivitity of programs

The "fact of" U.S. reconnaissance satellites was a matter of extreme sensitivity, even after the Soviets were made aware of it as part of arms control negotiations. [The] "Soviet Union could be particularly disturbed by public recognition of this capability [satellite photography]...which it has veiled."[4].

There was considerably more sensitivity to admitting even to "the fact of" US satellite SIGINT [5]. The US decided to admit to using satellites for SIGINT and MASINT in 1996. [6].

Later generations of NRO platforms

Imagery

US programs are most commonly known by a designation in the numbered KH (for KEYHOLE) series. The code words for the specific satellites are tightly held.

The latest generation has been called either KH-14 or Advanced KH-13.

SIGINT

US SIGINT satellites have included the CANYON series Rhyolite/Aquacade series, succeeded by the Vortex/Magnum/Orion and Mentor. Where the preceding satellites were in close to geosynchronous orbit, JUMPSEAT/TRUMPET satellites were in Moliyna orbits giving better polar coverage. [7] From 1972 to 1989, low earth orbit SIGINT satellites were launched only as secondary payloads with KH-9 and KH-11 IMINT satellites. They were code-named after female sex symbols, such as RAQUEL, FARRAH, BRIDGET and MARILYN.

Four geosychronous RHYOLITE satellites were launched in the seventies, with COMINT and TELINT missions. After having the name compromised when Christopher Boyce sold information to the Soviets, the code name was changed to AQUACADE.

In the late seventies, another class of geosynchronous SIGINT satellites, first called CHALET and renamed VORTEX after the code name was compromised. After the loss of Iranian monitoring stations, these satellites were also given a TELINT capability.

JUMPSEAT ELINT satellites, using a Moliyna orbit, started launching in 1975.

MAGNUM geosynchronous SIGINT satellites were first launched from the Space Shuttle in 1985. These were believed to be more sensitive and perhaps stealthier than RHYOLITE/AQUACADE.[8]

Future Generation Technology

Memorandum for Director of Central Intelligence Subject: Small Satellite Review Panel Unclassified July 1996

References

  1. Richelson, Jeffrey, ed. (13 July 2007), Secrecy and U.S. Satellite Reconnaissance, 1958-1976, vol. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 225
  2. 2.0 2.1 Charyk, Joseph (20 July 1961), Management of the National Reconnaissance Program (Draft), in Richelson, Jeffrey, The NRO Declassified, vol. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 225 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "NSAEBB35-02" defined multiple times with different content
  3. Faga, Martin C. (18 January 1993), NRO Strategic Plan, in Richelson, Jeffrey, The NRO Declassified, vol. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 225
  4. Laird, Melvin R. (June 8, 1972). Memorandum for Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, Subject: Revelation of the Fact of Satellite Reconnaissance in Connection with the Submission of Arms Limitation Agreements to Congress. Retrieved on 2007-10-02.
  5. Ellsworth, Robert M. (June 16, 1976). Memorandum for [then-Director of Central Intelligence Mr. Bush, Subject: Declassification of Satellite Reconnaissance]. Retrieved on 2007-10-05.
  6. The White House (September 19, 1996). National Space Policy.
  7. Submarine cable interception, Talinn University
  8. Richelson, Jeffrey T. (1989), Chapter 8: Signals Intelligence, The U.S. Intelligence Community, Ballinger