Talk:Old English: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (Beowulf) |
imported>Brian P. Long (→Old English v. Anglo-Saxon: new section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Beowulf survives in its entirety, except for some very small lacunae. The text of this article should be revised to reflect that. [[User:Michel van der Hoek|Michel van der Hoek]] 20:10, 28 April 2008 (CDT) | Beowulf survives in its entirety, except for some very small lacunae. The text of this article should be revised to reflect that. [[User:Michel van der Hoek|Michel van der Hoek]] 20:10, 28 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Changed - how about [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Old_English&diff=100320957&oldid=100319130 this]? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 21:28, 28 April 2008 (CDT) | :Changed - how about [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Old_English&diff=100320957&oldid=100319130 this]? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 21:28, 28 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
== Old English v. Anglo-Saxon == | |||
What's the rationale for having this article live at 'Old English' rather than 'Anglo-saxon'? My very subjective, imprecise sense is that unlike Middle English, academics usually refer to the language as Anglo-saxon (this despite the fact that the standard linguistic abbreviation for Anglo-saxon is "OE"). Is this impression incorrect? [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 07:59, 29 April 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 06:59, 29 April 2008
Beowulf
Beowulf survives in its entirety, except for some very small lacunae. The text of this article should be revised to reflect that. Michel van der Hoek 20:10, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
- Changed - how about this? John Stephenson 21:28, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
Old English v. Anglo-Saxon
What's the rationale for having this article live at 'Old English' rather than 'Anglo-saxon'? My very subjective, imprecise sense is that unlike Middle English, academics usually refer to the language as Anglo-saxon (this despite the fact that the standard linguistic abbreviation for Anglo-saxon is "OE"). Is this impression incorrect? Brian P. Long 07:59, 29 April 2008 (CDT)