Talk:Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>George Swan
(subpages)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Another link on the case ==
Probably with high overlap to ref 1 but may be useful nonetheless, so I paste it in here: [http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/499_US_340.htm http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/499_US_340.htm]. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 23:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:12, 19 November 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A U.S. Supreme Court case which determined that facts or lists of facts could not be copyrighted. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Law [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Another link on the case

Probably with high overlap to ref 1 but may be useful nonetheless, so I paste it in here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/499_US_340.htm. --Daniel Mietchen 23:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Feist_Publications_v._Rural_Telephone_Service&oldid=454931"