Talk:Archive:Workgroup Weeks: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Robert W King |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:What I'm thinking is, there's a grassroots concept called "microformats" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats WP article here] which supposedly can capture data somewhat autonomously; and I'm pretty sure that Yahoo! Buzz, Digg, del.icio.us, Reddit, and Newsvine all have some kind of interface api which could translate the data we capture and put it on a post. If there's a way to capture the introduction paragraph of each article based on some criteria as defined by the microformat, it might not be that tough to set up some system to make it work. Also, I'm sure that digg and other sites already have the code required to provide feedback on how many times a site has been hit, so it would be just a matter of converting that to some comment code. The only thing is I'm not sure how the returned number of hits/diggs, etc. would get to CZ; I don't know if there could be an external text file that gets parsed or if there would be a required bot to actually update a page. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:31, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | :What I'm thinking is, there's a grassroots concept called "microformats" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats WP article here] which supposedly can capture data somewhat autonomously; and I'm pretty sure that Yahoo! Buzz, Digg, del.icio.us, Reddit, and Newsvine all have some kind of interface api which could translate the data we capture and put it on a post. If there's a way to capture the introduction paragraph of each article based on some criteria as defined by the microformat, it might not be that tough to set up some system to make it work. Also, I'm sure that digg and other sites already have the code required to provide feedback on how many times a site has been hit, so it would be just a matter of converting that to some comment code. The only thing is I'm not sure how the returned number of hits/diggs, etc. would get to CZ; I don't know if there could be an external text file that gets parsed or if there would be a required bot to actually update a page. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:31, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
::Here's the "official" microformat page: http://microformats.org/ --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 14:50, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:50, 24 April 2008
Experts
I already whacked on CZ:Why should experts join CZ? a fair amount, so I have signed up for that. I could use some guidance on what else we need to say there, etc, etc. CZ Talk:Why should experts join CZ? awaits.... J. Noel Chiappa 19:46, 22 April 2008 (CDT)
Will do. --Larry Sanger 13:15, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
Eduzendium
I think we should probably be approaching departments or department heads to see if they're interested in the program. --Robert W King 12:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea, and Workgroup Weeks is the perfect time to raise the idea. --Larry Sanger 12:24, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
What else
You know what else might be great? If we had a bot or something that once each week made a post on digg, or reddit, or any of these social networking services of the introduction paragraph to one of our approved articles. Maybe we can even include some kind of digg/reddit/delicious counter that updates in an html comment field in the page source so we know how many times it has been read. --Robert W King 13:13, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Cool! Like, do it! --Larry Sanger 13:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Also...while I'm planning out the details as you can see...I'm not sure how I would convert your suggestion above into instructions for people. Seems like there would be many steps. You can feel free to jump in there if you want to spell it out. --Larry Sanger 13:23, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
- What I'm thinking is, there's a grassroots concept called "microformats" WP article here which supposedly can capture data somewhat autonomously; and I'm pretty sure that Yahoo! Buzz, Digg, del.icio.us, Reddit, and Newsvine all have some kind of interface api which could translate the data we capture and put it on a post. If there's a way to capture the introduction paragraph of each article based on some criteria as defined by the microformat, it might not be that tough to set up some system to make it work. Also, I'm sure that digg and other sites already have the code required to provide feedback on how many times a site has been hit, so it would be just a matter of converting that to some comment code. The only thing is I'm not sure how the returned number of hits/diggs, etc. would get to CZ; I don't know if there could be an external text file that gets parsed or if there would be a required bot to actually update a page. --Robert W King 13:31, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
- Here's the "official" microformat page: http://microformats.org/ --Robert W King 14:50, 24 April 2008 (CDT)