Talk:Semantic Web: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Blake Willmarth (reply to HCB) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
: I'm not sure what your mechanical observation referred to, and if we did it correctly or not. [[User:Blake Willmarth|Blake Willmarth]] 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | : I'm not sure what your mechanical observation referred to, and if we did it correctly or not. [[User:Blake Willmarth|Blake Willmarth]] 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::My observation meant you did something wise: starting with an article that had the proper CZ formatting rather than fight the learning curve. Your efforts, which are appreciated, went into adding meaningful content. Thanks! 04:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:47, 12 August 2010
Excellent Eduzendium work
I'm enjoying the added content in this article, and learning from it
A mechanical observation: starting from an existing stub that has all the CZ metadata and overhead in place, a standard lede, etc., may be a very promising way to do Eduzendium.
If you can split the code lines so they don't have to scroll horizontally, that would be desirable, but I don't know if the example is allowed to split to multiple lines. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:28, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! I followed your advice on line-splitting (the syntax is okay) and tried to simplify some of the language. There's still some cleaning up to do before tomorrow evening (due date). I can understand if CZ editors may wish to move off some of the technical stuff to separate pages, we just wanted to cover a bit of everything.
- I'm not sure what your mechanical observation referred to, and if we did it correctly or not. Blake Willmarth 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- My observation meant you did something wise: starting with an article that had the proper CZ formatting rather than fight the learning curve. Your efforts, which are appreciated, went into adding meaningful content. Thanks! 04:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)