Talk:Introduction to quantum mechanics: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day |
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Proposal == | == Proposal == | ||
I propose that people that are knowledgeable about quantum mechanics list here topics that should be included in an article on quantum mechanics for the layperson. (Maybe that would be a better title of this article?). I hope that skilled non-science writers pick this up and make a readable, consistent, article out of it. If they slip or misunderstand something don't worry, that has happened to every learner of QM. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 12:19, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | I propose that people that are knowledgeable about quantum mechanics list here topics that should be included in an article on quantum mechanics for the layperson. (Maybe that would be a better title of this article?). I hope that skilled (possibly, or even preferably, non-science) writers pick this up and make a readable, consistent, article out of it. If they slip or misunderstand something don't worry, that has happened to every learner of QM. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 12:19, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Recall we have a Student Level subpage that has not been utilized much yet. Such an article would live at [[Quantum mechanics/Student Level]]. One problem is I'm not sure we have really defined the role of this subpage, although I would think aiming it at the layperson should be the target. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 12:31, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | :Recall we have a Student Level subpage that has not been utilized much yet. Such an article would live at [[Quantum mechanics/Student Level]]. One problem is I'm not sure we have really defined the role of this subpage, although I would think aiming it at the layperson should be the target. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 12:31, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
::I was not thinking of students, but of journalists and of other interested adults that want to widen their horizon, but it could be useful to (non-physics) students as well. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 12:38, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
==Historical approach?== | |||
An approach could be historical (I write this from memory, I'm without books): | |||
#Around 1890 physics is "finished", minor detail: UV catastrophe. | |||
#1900 Planck solves UV catastrophe by quantizing the energy of harmonic oscillator (Insert here: explanation harmonic oscillator and its use in physical models). | |||
#1905 Einstein proposes that light consists of virtual quantized oscillators to explain photoelectric effect | |||
#Around 1910 quantization lattice vibrations (Einstein Debye crystal) | |||
#1913 Bohr atom | |||
#1915 Old Bohr-Sommerfeld quantum theory | |||
#1924 de Broglie: (very very light) particle shows wave properties (insert about waves) | |||
#1925 Heisenberg, Born, Jordan: matrix mechanics (insert about matrices) | |||
#1926 Schroedinger wave equations (time-independent, time-dependent), relation with matrix mechanics | |||
#1926 Spin | |||
#1927 Pauli exclusion principle, Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Non-relativistic QM essentially finished at this point in time. | |||
--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 12:38, 1 April 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:38, 1 April 2008
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Proposal
I propose that people that are knowledgeable about quantum mechanics list here topics that should be included in an article on quantum mechanics for the layperson. (Maybe that would be a better title of this article?). I hope that skilled (possibly, or even preferably, non-science) writers pick this up and make a readable, consistent, article out of it. If they slip or misunderstand something don't worry, that has happened to every learner of QM. --Paul Wormer 12:19, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- Recall we have a Student Level subpage that has not been utilized much yet. Such an article would live at Quantum mechanics/Student Level. One problem is I'm not sure we have really defined the role of this subpage, although I would think aiming it at the layperson should be the target. Chris Day 12:31, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- I was not thinking of students, but of journalists and of other interested adults that want to widen their horizon, but it could be useful to (non-physics) students as well. --Paul Wormer 12:38, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Historical approach?
An approach could be historical (I write this from memory, I'm without books):
- Around 1890 physics is "finished", minor detail: UV catastrophe.
- 1900 Planck solves UV catastrophe by quantizing the energy of harmonic oscillator (Insert here: explanation harmonic oscillator and its use in physical models).
- 1905 Einstein proposes that light consists of virtual quantized oscillators to explain photoelectric effect
- Around 1910 quantization lattice vibrations (Einstein Debye crystal)
- 1913 Bohr atom
- 1915 Old Bohr-Sommerfeld quantum theory
- 1924 de Broglie: (very very light) particle shows wave properties (insert about waves)
- 1925 Heisenberg, Born, Jordan: matrix mechanics (insert about matrices)
- 1926 Schroedinger wave equations (time-independent, time-dependent), relation with matrix mechanics
- 1926 Spin
- 1927 Pauli exclusion principle, Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Non-relativistic QM essentially finished at this point in time.
--Paul Wormer 12:38, 1 April 2008 (CDT)