Template talk:Chem infobox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk (remove picture please?) |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Robert, I would like to leave out the chemical structure pictures, or make it a "if exist" type of variable, because the pictures will be too small to see for many chemicals, or the box will need to be very fat. I notice WP uses pictures on many articles, but can't fit them in to many others. So, I was thinking that the structure picture goes on top right (not in the template) and the template would be directly under the picture. That way we can scale the structures to always be readable while giving the template a slim profile. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 15:37, 20 March 2008 (CDT) | Robert, I would like to leave out the chemical structure pictures, or make it a "if exist" type of variable, because the pictures will be too small to see for many chemicals, or the box will need to be very fat. I notice WP uses pictures on many articles, but can't fit them in to many others. So, I was thinking that the structure picture goes on top right (not in the template) and the template would be directly under the picture. That way we can scale the structures to always be readable while giving the template a slim profile. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 15:37, 20 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
:In that case, if I put the picture on the top box, it might work out ok. Can you make an example on your talk page or this talk page? --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 15:39, 20 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:39, 20 March 2008
Thanks for the quick action Robert! :) David E. Volk 15:23, 20 March 2008 (CDT)
- I want to make this a major improvement over the elem box. --Robert W King 15:24, 20 March 2008 (CDT)
Robert, I would like to leave out the chemical structure pictures, or make it a "if exist" type of variable, because the pictures will be too small to see for many chemicals, or the box will need to be very fat. I notice WP uses pictures on many articles, but can't fit them in to many others. So, I was thinking that the structure picture goes on top right (not in the template) and the template would be directly under the picture. That way we can scale the structures to always be readable while giving the template a slim profile. David E. Volk 15:37, 20 March 2008 (CDT)
- In that case, if I put the picture on the top box, it might work out ok. Can you make an example on your talk page or this talk page? --Robert W King 15:39, 20 March 2008 (CDT)