Monitor theory/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Dvorak
m (subpages)
imported>John Stephenson
(Krashen 1981; Markee 1987)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
*Gregg KR (1984) 'Krashen's Monitor and Occam's Razar.' ''Applied Linguistics'' 5(2): 79-100.
*Gregg, K.R. (1984). 'Krashen's Monitor and Occam's Razar.' ''Applied Linguistics'' 5(2): 79-100.
*Krashen SD (1982) ''Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition''. Oxford: Pergamon.
*Krashen, S.D. (1981). ''Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning''. Elsevier. [http://www.sdkrashen.com/SL_Acquisition_and_Learning/index.html Online version] available at Stephen Krashen's website.
*Krashen SD (1985) ''The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications''. New York: Longman.
*Krashen, S.D. (1982). ''Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition''. Oxford: Pergamon. [http://www.sdkrashen.com/Principles_and_Practice/index.html Online version] available at Stephen Krashen's website.
*Krashen SD (1996) 'The case for narrow listening.' ''System'' 24(1): 97-100.
*Krashen, S.D. (1985). ''The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications''. New York: Longman.
*Krashen SD (2003). ''Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use''. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
*Krashen, S.D. (1996). 'The case for narrow listening.' ''System'' 24(1): 97-100.
*Krashen SD & Terrell TD (1983) ''The Natural Approach''. New York: Pergamon.
*Krashen, S.D. (2003). ''Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use''. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
*Scrivener J (2005) ''Learning Teaching''. Oxford: Macmillan. 2nd edition.
*Krashen, S.D. & T.D. Terrell (1983) ''The Natural Approach''. New York: Pergamon.
*VanPatten B and Williams J (eds) (2007) ''Theories in Second Language Acquisition: an Introduction''. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
*Markee, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=eDOZ8pDAjgcC Managing Curricular Innovation]''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*White L (1987) 'Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of second language competence.' ''Applied Linguistics'' 8(2): 95-110.
*Scrivener, J. (2005). ''Learning Teaching''. Oxford: Macmillan. 2nd edition.
*VanPatten, B. and J. Williams (eds) (2007). ''Theories in Second Language Acquisition: an Introduction''. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
*White, L. (1987). 'Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of second language competence.' ''Applied Linguistics'' 8(2): 95-110.

Revision as of 02:15, 4 August 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A list of key readings about Monitor theory.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
  • Gregg, K.R. (1984). 'Krashen's Monitor and Occam's Razar.' Applied Linguistics 5(2): 79-100.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Elsevier. Online version available at Stephen Krashen's website.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Online version available at Stephen Krashen's website.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1996). 'The case for narrow listening.' System 24(1): 97-100.
  • Krashen, S.D. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Krashen, S.D. & T.D. Terrell (1983) The Natural Approach. New York: Pergamon.
  • Markee, Managing Curricular Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan. 2nd edition.
  • VanPatten, B. and J. Williams (eds) (2007). Theories in Second Language Acquisition: an Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • White, L. (1987). 'Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of second language competence.' Applied Linguistics 8(2): 95-110.