National DNA Database: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephan Burn mNo edit summary |
imported>Stephan Burn m (Changing from list to prose) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| format = | | format = | ||
| doi = | | doi = | ||
| accessdate = December 05, 2007}}</ref>. | | accessdate = December 05, 2007}}</ref>. As of 31 March 2006, the database held 3,785,571 profiles<ref name=AnnualReport>{{cite web | ||
| last = | | last = | ||
| first = | | first = | ||
Line 28: | Line 24: | ||
| format = PDF | | format = PDF | ||
| doi = | | doi = | ||
| accessdate = December 05, 2007}}</ref> | | accessdate = December 05, 2007}}</ref> which equates to 5.2% of the UK population<ref name=HomeOffice />, ten times that of the US which has captured the DNA records of only 0.5% of the population<ref name=BBCArticle2>{{cite web | ||
| last = | |||
| first = | |||
| authorlink = | |||
| coauthors = | |||
| title = Has our DNA database gone too far? | |||
| work = | |||
| publisher = BBC News | |||
| date = September 05, 2007 | |||
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6979165.stm | |||
| format = | |||
| doi = | |||
| accessdate = December 06, 2007}}</ref>. The key difference is that in the UK, samples and profiles are not deleted if the person in question wasn't charged with a crime, or even if their samples were collected to exclude them from investigations. Due to this, the database grows by around 30,000 records per month<ref name=BBCArticle1>{{cite web | |||
| last = | | last = | ||
| first = | | first = | ||
Line 44: | Line 48: | ||
| format = | | format = | ||
| doi = | | doi = | ||
| accessdate = December 05, 2007}}</ref> | | accessdate = December 05, 2007}}</ref> and has the profiles of 24,000 uncovicted children aged 10 to 17<ref name=BBCArticle1 />. | ||
== Statistics == | |||
Number of records held: 3,785,571 at 31/03/2006 <ref name=AnnualReport /> | |||
Percentage of population on database: 5.2% <ref name=HomeOffice /> | |||
Monthly growth: 30,000 <ref name=BBCArticle1 /> | |||
Number profiles of unconvicted 10-17 year olds: 24,000 <ref name= | Number profiles of unconvicted 10-17 year olds: 24,000 <ref name=BBCArticle1 /> | ||
Number of crimes solved per year using DNA database: 20,000 <ref name= | Number of crimes solved per year using DNA database: 20,000 <ref name=BBCArticle1 /> | ||
Cost from 2002 to 2007: £300 million <ref name=HomeOffice /> | Cost from 2002 to 2007: £300 million <ref name=HomeOffice /> |
Revision as of 04:23, 6 December 2007
The National DNA Database is an initiative by the United Kingdom government to store the DNA records of those accused of crimes and from crime scenes and retaining all samples collected. Regulated by the Home Office, the database is described as a "key police intelligence tool"[1]. As of 31 March 2006, the database held 3,785,571 profiles[2] which equates to 5.2% of the UK population[1], ten times that of the US which has captured the DNA records of only 0.5% of the population[3]. The key difference is that in the UK, samples and profiles are not deleted if the person in question wasn't charged with a crime, or even if their samples were collected to exclude them from investigations. Due to this, the database grows by around 30,000 records per month[4] and has the profiles of 24,000 uncovicted children aged 10 to 17[4].
Statistics
Number of records held: 3,785,571 at 31/03/2006 [2]
Percentage of population on database: 5.2% [1]
Monthly growth: 30,000 [4]
Number profiles of unconvicted 10-17 year olds: 24,000 [4]
Number of crimes solved per year using DNA database: 20,000 [4]
Cost from 2002 to 2007: £300 million [1]
Controversy
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Home Office - The national DNA database. Home Office. Retrieved on December 05, 2007.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Home Office - The National DNA Database Annual Report 2005-2006 (PDF). Home Office. Retrieved on December 05, 2007.
- ↑ Has our DNA database gone too far?. BBC News (September 05, 2007). Retrieved on December 06, 2007.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 All UK 'must be on DNA database'. BBC News (September 05, 2007). Retrieved on December 05, 2007.