Talk:Moment of a force: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
m (Talk:Moment of a Force moved to Talk:Moment of a force: naming convention)
imported>David H. Barrett
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
Could someone please take a look at this sentence:
"However, being two distinct and separate physical concepts the units are always written as newton metres and never as joules."
I think this needs work to make sense, but being unfamiliar with the overall concept I'd rather someone take a look and see if I'm right.
For example, does the following make sense?
"However, because newton metres and joules are distinct and separate physical concepts, newton metres is always used when referring to moment of force."

Revision as of 18:21, 20 August 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The ability of a force to generate rotational motion about an axis. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics and Engineering [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Could someone please take a look at this sentence:

"However, being two distinct and separate physical concepts the units are always written as newton metres and never as joules."

I think this needs work to make sense, but being unfamiliar with the overall concept I'd rather someone take a look and see if I'm right.

For example, does the following make sense?

"However, because newton metres and joules are distinct and separate physical concepts, newton metres is always used when referring to moment of force."

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Moment_of_a_force&oldid=343485"