Talk:Richard Dawkins: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Stephen Ewen
(The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine by Alister E. McGrath and Joanna Collicutt Mcgrath)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
An interesting [http://www.amazon.com/Dawkins-Delusion-Atheist-Fundamentalism-Denial/dp/083083446X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1195524334&sr=8-2 new book by Oxford prof Alister E. McGrath and his wife Joanna, a prof at Heythrop College] is devoted to their answer to ''The God Delusion''.  "The McGraths are frustrated, then, that Dawkins continues to write on the a priori, nonscientific assumption that religious believers are either deluded or meretricious, never pausing to consider the evidence not in his favor or the complex beliefs and practices of actual Christians. They conclude disquietingly: perhaps Dawkins is aware that demagogic ranting that displays confidence in the face of counterevidence is the way to sway unlearned masses." [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 20:18, 19 November 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 20:18, 19 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Works [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition British ethologist, evolutionary biologist; writer and broadcaster on science and atheism (born 1941). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology, Religion and Topic Informant [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

An interesting new book by Oxford prof Alister E. McGrath and his wife Joanna, a prof at Heythrop College is devoted to their answer to The God Delusion. "The McGraths are frustrated, then, that Dawkins continues to write on the a priori, nonscientific assumption that religious believers are either deluded or meretricious, never pausing to consider the evidence not in his favor or the complex beliefs and practices of actual Christians. They conclude disquietingly: perhaps Dawkins is aware that demagogic ranting that displays confidence in the face of counterevidence is the way to sway unlearned masses." Stephen Ewen 20:18, 19 November 2007 (CST)