Talk:Back-chaining: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe (→You) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→You: see how easy it was?) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Done. - So you put the WP thingy in - but it's still invisible here - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 17:31, 27 December 2007 (CST) | :Done. - So you put the WP thingy in - but it's still invisible here - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 17:31, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:Now I notice in the history [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] had already recreated the article with WP in, thanks, John. I suppose it has to be done when creating... [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 17:42, 27 December 2007 (CST) | :Now I notice in the history [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] had already recreated the article with WP in, thanks, John. I suppose it has to be done when creating... [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 17:42, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
::See how easy it was for a man of skills to de-You things, hehe? As for the WP notice, I've recently discovered that for *some* things to take effect, an actual edit has to be done to the article itself before it takes effect. In this case, I stuck an "x" in the article, saved it, reopened the article, removed the "x" and saved it again. But by now the WP notice was there. At least on *my* screen. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:41, 27 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:41, 27 December 2007
WP
This started life on Wikipedia; however, checking the WP box doesn't work, at least not for me - Ro Thorpe 16:08, 27 December 2007 (CST)
You
Didn't you (and I also) take out some second-person stuff in the Bowling article? It's certainly easier to use in an article like this, but I wonder if it should be? It's really not v. encyclopediac.... Hayford Peirce 16:16, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Interesting. I suppose on 29 Sept over at WP things just didn't feel so formal (Mesdames et Messieurs). I'll see what I can do... Ro Thorpe 17:18, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Done. - So you put the WP thingy in - but it's still invisible here - Ro Thorpe 17:31, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Now I notice in the history John Stephenson had already recreated the article with WP in, thanks, John. I suppose it has to be done when creating... Ro Thorpe 17:42, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- See how easy it was for a man of skills to de-You things, hehe? As for the WP notice, I've recently discovered that for *some* things to take effect, an actual edit has to be done to the article itself before it takes effect. In this case, I stuck an "x" in the article, saved it, reopened the article, removed the "x" and saved it again. But by now the WP notice was there. At least on *my* screen. Hayford Peirce 18:41, 27 December 2007 (CST)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Education Developing Articles
- Education Nonstub Articles
- Education Internal Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles
- Education Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Linguistics Underlinked Articles