Talk:Séance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (problems with this article) |
imported>Chris Day |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Talk:Séance/Permission]] | |||
==Problems with this article== | ==Problems with this article== | ||
I'm sorry, because I realise the procedures outlined on this page are the product of well-meaning investigation, but this is not the sort of thing that should be presented as accepted fact on CZ. I can see our critics having a field day with this. Despite the notice at the top, the whole thing is undermining scientific principles, and the neutrality on which CZ is based: e.g. that there is a supernatural realm, that humans survive the deaths of the brains and can become ghostly entities, etc. At best, this could go on a subpage such as an invited article. Otherwise, it should be completely rewritten or deleted. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:23, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | I'm sorry, because I realise the procedures outlined on this page are the product of well-meaning investigation, but this is not the sort of thing that should be presented as accepted fact on CZ. I can see our critics having a field day with this. Despite the notice at the top, the whole thing is undermining scientific principles, and the neutrality on which CZ is based: e.g. that there is a supernatural realm, that humans survive the deaths of the brains and can become ghostly entities, etc. At best, this could go on a subpage such as an invited article. Otherwise, it should be completely rewritten or deleted. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:23, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I have to agree. It is written in the style of a personal essay. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 20:26, 18 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 19:26, 18 October 2007
Problems with this article
I'm sorry, because I realise the procedures outlined on this page are the product of well-meaning investigation, but this is not the sort of thing that should be presented as accepted fact on CZ. I can see our critics having a field day with this. Despite the notice at the top, the whole thing is undermining scientific principles, and the neutrality on which CZ is based: e.g. that there is a supernatural realm, that humans survive the deaths of the brains and can become ghostly entities, etc. At best, this could go on a subpage such as an invited article. Otherwise, it should be completely rewritten or deleted. John Stephenson 20:23, 18 October 2007 (CDT)