Censorship: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce m (removed an unnecessary hyphen) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Censorship''' is the act of preventing specifically | '''Censorship''' is the act of preventing specifically defined ideals, concepts, images, or messages from being available to a given population. For example, the "[[great firewall]]" that is run by the Chinese government, is a means to control the influence of outside politics from entering the country through media channels and the internet. | ||
Additionally, censorship can also be employed by corporations in order to shape public perception. Legal means such as [[Non-Disclosure Agreement]]s, information security classification([[Top Secret]], [[Secret]], [[Classified]], [[For Official Use Only]]), and contract stipulation can provide legal ramifications for violating [[terms of agreement]] that specify what can or cannot be said. | Additionally, censorship can also be employed by corporations in order to shape public perception. Legal means such as [[Non-Disclosure Agreement]]s, information security classification([[Top Secret]], [[Secret]], [[Classified]], [[For Official Use Only]]), and contract stipulation can provide legal ramifications for violating [[terms of agreement]] that specify what can or cannot be said. | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 12 October 2007
Censorship is the act of preventing specifically defined ideals, concepts, images, or messages from being available to a given population. For example, the "great firewall" that is run by the Chinese government, is a means to control the influence of outside politics from entering the country through media channels and the internet.
Additionally, censorship can also be employed by corporations in order to shape public perception. Legal means such as Non-Disclosure Agreements, information security classification(Top Secret, Secret, Classified, For Official Use Only), and contract stipulation can provide legal ramifications for violating terms of agreement that specify what can or cannot be said.
Viewpoint
The prominence of censorship can be always debated depending on the position, viewpoint, and motivation of the parties involved in the dispute.