Sword: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Different kinds of swords developed around the world, but ultimately swords served two main combative functions: to slice through your opponent, either killing him or to remove an extremity; or to penetrate his body to pierce vital organs. | Different kinds of swords developed around the world, but ultimately swords served two main combative functions: to slice through your opponent, either killing him or to remove an extremity; or to penetrate his body to pierce vital organs. | ||
In ancient oriental cultures, | In ancient oriental cultures, swords ([[katana]]s or other similar small blades) were designed to be used in a swift swinging motion, prefering quick, light, sharp, blades that would cut through an opponent with minimal effort. This contrasted greatly with the swords developed by european feudal cultures, where swords were meant more for thrust and parry. | ||
Revision as of 20:31, 10 October 2007
Since the dawn of man, hate, rivalry, and competition for survival have driven humans to fight each other through combat. The earliest weapons in combat were probably sticks, rocks, pointed objects, or items that could be used to bludgeon one's opponent to death. Around the discovery of metallurgy and blacksmithing, a more lethal tool was devised: the sword.
Different kinds of swords developed around the world, but ultimately swords served two main combative functions: to slice through your opponent, either killing him or to remove an extremity; or to penetrate his body to pierce vital organs.
In ancient oriental cultures, swords (katanas or other similar small blades) were designed to be used in a swift swinging motion, prefering quick, light, sharp, blades that would cut through an opponent with minimal effort. This contrasted greatly with the swords developed by european feudal cultures, where swords were meant more for thrust and parry.