Talk:Ham (food): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson m (typo) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Move: Can we get some other opinions as to whether Ham (food) should remain there or be Moved to Ham) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Move== | ==Move== | ||
I think that by default we think of the meat first and foremost. I recommend moving this to [[Ham]]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 22:07, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | I think that by default we think of the meat first and foremost. I recommend moving this to [[Ham]]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 22:07, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Well, in principle I agree. But I've seen a gazillion articles at WP that have been moved around and back and forth and disambig. pages etc. I just thought it would be safer to do it this way, even if it appears to be overkill at the moment. Let's get some other opinions on this before anything is done.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 22:21, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:21, 26 September 2007
Move
I think that by default we think of the meat first and foremost. I recommend moving this to Ham. John Stephenson 22:07, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
- Well, in principle I agree. But I've seen a gazillion articles at WP that have been moved around and back and forth and disambig. pages etc. I just thought it would be safer to do it this way, even if it appears to be overkill at the moment. Let's get some other opinions on this before anything is done.... Hayford Peirce 22:21, 26 September 2007 (CDT)