Talk:Macroeconomics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
(The treatment of monetarism)
Line 12: Line 12:
|                  by = --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 08:57, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 08:57, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
== The treatment of monetarism ==
In this draft I have dismissed the simplistic version of monetarism without coming to a conclusion about the validity of the more sophisticated version employed by monetary economists.
This avoids unnecessary controversy. To my mind the matter is, in any case, not worth pursuing. Monetarism was abandoned because monetary control was found impracticable, not because its theoretical grounding was found wanting. I plan to bring that out in the section on the management of the economy.
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:45, 24 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:45, 24 September 2007



Article Checklist for "Macroeconomics"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 08:57, 21 September 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





The treatment of monetarism

In this draft I have dismissed the simplistic version of monetarism without coming to a conclusion about the validity of the more sophisticated version employed by monetary economists. This avoids unnecessary controversy. To my mind the matter is, in any case, not worth pursuing. Monetarism was abandoned because monetary control was found impracticable, not because its theoretical grounding was found wanting. I plan to bring that out in the section on the management of the economy.

Nick Gardner 10:45, 24 September 2007 (CDT)