CZ:Editor Policy: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger m (CZ:Editor Pages moved to CZ:Editor Policy) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
''Citizens--please pitch in. We need your design skills. We're adding several new introductory pages for different aspects of the CZ community. They'll be inviting--simple and well-designed. Your help with coming up with excellent MediaWiki code designs for these introductory pages will be most appreciated. Most importantly will be our new project home page, [[CZ:Home]], which will replace [[CZ:Project Home]]. Please dive in if you have the time and inclination, and I'll help of course. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]]'' | ''Citizens--please pitch in. We need your design skills. We're adding several new introductory pages for different aspects of the CZ community. They'll be inviting--simple and well-designed. Your help with coming up with excellent MediaWiki code designs for these introductory pages will be most appreciated. Most importantly will be our new project home page, [[CZ:Home]], which will replace [[CZ:Project Home]]. Please dive in if you have the time and inclination, and I'll help of course. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]]'' | ||
'''Deferring to editors.''' Generally speaking, authors are expected to defer to whomever is an editor for that article. This means at least two things: | |||
*When an editor has expressed a decision on an article's discussion page, that decision must be followed by authors, even if it is under appeal. | |||
*When an editor has made a certain edit, and has specifically requested that some limited portion of text should not be changed (or that it must not be changed in certain limited ways), then authors should respect the request. (Editors may not request that articles be simply left alone.) | |||
''Note:'' expectation of deference applies only to an editor's own areas of expertise. There is no obligation to defer in this way to an editor when the editor is writing on a subject outside of his or her area of expertise. Of course, all authors should treat each other quite respectfully and, in that way, deferentially. | |||
Revision as of 09:09, 6 September 2007
Citizens--please pitch in. We need your design skills. We're adding several new introductory pages for different aspects of the CZ community. They'll be inviting--simple and well-designed. Your help with coming up with excellent MediaWiki code designs for these introductory pages will be most appreciated. Most importantly will be our new project home page, CZ:Home, which will replace CZ:Project Home. Please dive in if you have the time and inclination, and I'll help of course. --Larry Sanger
Deferring to editors. Generally speaking, authors are expected to defer to whomever is an editor for that article. This means at least two things:
- When an editor has expressed a decision on an article's discussion page, that decision must be followed by authors, even if it is under appeal.
- When an editor has made a certain edit, and has specifically requested that some limited portion of text should not be changed (or that it must not be changed in certain limited ways), then authors should respect the request. (Editors may not request that articles be simply left alone.)
Note: expectation of deference applies only to an editor's own areas of expertise. There is no obligation to defer in this way to an editor when the editor is writing on a subject outside of his or her area of expertise. Of course, all authors should treat each other quite respectfully and, in that way, deferentially.