Talk:Van der Waals equation/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>David E. Volk
(Suggest Approval, point out possible typo)
Line 14: Line 14:


I changed a lot in the CZ version w.r.t the WP version (added a graph and removed a redundant equation), but forgot to switch off the WP flag. I dare now to give it status 1.  --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
I changed a lot in the CZ version w.r.t the WP version (added a graph and removed a redundant equation), but forgot to switch off the WP flag. I dare now to give it status 1.  --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
{{ToApprive}}
However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure
[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:47, 4 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Van der Waals equation/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories chemistry Workgroup, physics Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Paul Wormer 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





WP article is for 90% mine.--Paul Wormer 04:24, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

I changed a lot in the CZ version w.r.t the WP version (added a graph and removed a redundant equation), but forgot to switch off the WP flag. I dare now to give it status 1. --Paul Wormer 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

Template:ToApprive However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure David E. Volk 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT)