Talk:Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jason S. Colflesh No edit summary |
imported>Todd Coles (checklist) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions | |||
| cat1 = History | |||
| cat2 = Politics | |||
| cat3 = Law | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = n | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:24, 3 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
I noticed down in The Resolutions sections the following: "Both resolutions not only condemned the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional They went to claim that individual states could nullify federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional." I wasn't sure if the intent was to have separate sentances, have a comma, or something else, so I left it alone. --[[User:Jason S. Colflesh|Jason S. Colflesh]] 16:05, 30 July 2007 (CDT) | I noticed down in The Resolutions sections the following: "Both resolutions not only condemned the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional They went to claim that individual states could nullify federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional." I wasn't sure if the intent was to have separate sentances, have a comma, or something else, so I left it alone. --[[User:Jason S. Colflesh|Jason S. Colflesh]] 16:05, 30 July 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 14:24, 3 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup, Law Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Todd Coles 15:24, 3 August 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I noticed down in The Resolutions sections the following: "Both resolutions not only condemned the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional They went to claim that individual states could nullify federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional." I wasn't sure if the intent was to have separate sentances, have a comma, or something else, so I left it alone. --Jason S. Colflesh 16:05, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Law Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Law Advanced Articles
- Law Nonstub Articles
- Law Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Law Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Law Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- Law Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Politics External Articles
- Law External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- Law Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Politics Cleanup
- Law Cleanup