Talk:Biology/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Moreover, these books should be annotated. I've left spaces for the annotations. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:29, 7 July 2007 (CDT) | Moreover, these books should be annotated. I've left spaces for the annotations. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:29, 7 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
And how could I forget? The bibliographic entries themselves are not in any recognizable form. They should follow ''The Chicago Manual of Style.'' --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:33, 7 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:33, 7 July 2007
This page needs to be greatly expanded, obviously. It should make a few general textbook recommendations; there should be a book about the state of biology as a field today; there should be many more classics of biology (like Aristotle, Lamarck, Linnaeus, and Darwin--just to name names that even a philosopher is familiar with); and I'm sure there are many other general biology books of interest.
Moreover, these books should be annotated. I've left spaces for the annotations. --Larry Sanger 11:29, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
And how could I forget? The bibliographic entries themselves are not in any recognizable form. They should follow The Chicago Manual of Style. --Larry Sanger 11:33, 7 July 2007 (CDT)