Probability distribution: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ragnar Schroder
(Small clarifying edit in the "A more complicated example" section.)
imported>Ragnar Schroder
(Added new section: Probability distributions in practice)
Line 39: Line 39:
...
...


Clearly,  we don't believe the person will be 25.0 meters tall.  But neither do we believe any of the other propositions.  Why should any particular proposition turn out to be the ''exact'' correct one among an [[infinite]] number of others,  especially when an infinite [[subset]] of them are arbitrarily similar?
Clearly,  we don't believe the person will be 25.0 meters tall.  But neither do we believe any of the other propositions.  Why should any particular proposition turn out to be the ''exact'' correct one among an [[infinity]] of others?  


But we still somehow feel that the first propostion listed is more "likely" than the second,  which again is more "likely" than the third.
But we still somehow feel that the first propostion listed is more "likely" than the second,  which again is more "likely" than the third.
Line 65: Line 65:
Let f be a function from S to <math>R</math> such that
Let f be a function from S to <math>R</math> such that
*f(s) &isin; [0,1] for all s &isin; S
*f(s) &isin; [0,1] for all s &isin; S
*The [[Riemann integral]] <math> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(s)\,ds</math> exists and evaluates to exactly 1.
*The [[Riemann integral]] <math> \int_{-inf}^{inf} f(s)\,ds</math> exists and evaluates to exactly 1.


Then f is a probability distribution over the set S.
Then f is a probability distribution over the set S.
==Probability distributions in practice==
===Statistical methods used to choose between distributions and estimate parameters===
In the first example in this article, one may look through medical records to find approximately how many people are known to be hit by meteors per century,  and from that information create a [[statistic]] to [[statistical parameter estimation|estimate]] the probabilities.  A strict [[frequentist interpretation of probability|frequentist]] will stop there, most statisticians will allow non-[[statistics|statisticial]] information to be used to arrive at what would be considered the best available distribution to model the problem.  Such information would include knowledge and intuition about peoples tendency to  consult doctors after accidents, the comprehensiveness of the records and so on.


==References==
==References==
*[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,821063,00.htm Person actually hit by a meteorite]
*[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,821063,00.html]Person actually hit by a meteorite.
 


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 20:49, 26 June 2007

A probability distribution is a mathematical approach to quantifying uncertainty.


There are two main classes of probability distributions: Discrete and continuous. Discrete distributions describe variables that take on discrete values only (typically the positive integers), while continuous distributions describe variables that can take on arbitrary values in a continuum (typically the real numbers).

In more advanced studies, one also comes across hybrid distributions.


A gentle introduction to the concept

Faced with a set of mutually exclusive propositions or possible outcomes, people intuitively put "degrees of belief" on the different alternatives.


A simple example

When you wake up in the morning one of three thing may happen that day:

  • You will get hit by a meteor falling in from space.
  • You will not get hit by a meteor falling in from space, but you'll be struck by lightning.
  • Neither will happen.

Most people will usually intuit a small to zero belief in the first alternative (although it is possible, and is known to actually have occurred), a slightly larger belief in the second, and a rather strong belief in the third.

In mathematics, such intuitive ideas are captured, formalized and made precise by the concept of a discrete probability distribution.


A more complicated example

Rather than a simple list of propositions or outcomes like the one above, one may have a to deal with a continuum.

For example, consider the next new person you'll get to know. How tall will he or she be?

This can be formulated as an uncountably infinite set of propositions, or as a ditto set of possible outcomes of a random experiment.

Let's look at three of these propositions in detail:

...

  • The person is exactly 1.722222222... m tall.

...

  • The person is exactly 2.3 m tall.

...

  • The person is exactly 25.0 m tall.

...

Clearly, we don't believe the person will be 25.0 meters tall. But neither do we believe any of the other propositions. Why should any particular proposition turn out to be the exact correct one among an infinity of others?

But we still somehow feel that the first propostion listed is more "likely" than the second, which again is more "likely" than the third.

Also, we feel that some "ranges" are more likely than others, f.i. a height between 1.5 and 1.8 meters feels "likely", a height between 2.2 and 2.5 m seems possible but unlikely, and a height larger than that seems safe to exclude.

In mathematics, such intuitive ideas are captured, formalized and made precise by the concept of a continuous probability distribution.


A formal introduction

Discrete probability distributions

Let S be an enumerable set. S={..., s_0,s_1, ...}. Let f be a function from S to such that

  • f(s) ∈ [0,1] for all s ∈ S
  • The sum exists and evaluates to exactly 1.

Then f is a probability distribution over the set S.


Continuous probability distributions

Let S be an ordered uncountably infinite set.

Let f be a function from S to such that

  • f(s) ∈ [0,1] for all s ∈ S
  • The Riemann integral exists and evaluates to exactly 1.

Then f is a probability distribution over the set S.


Probability distributions in practice

Statistical methods used to choose between distributions and estimate parameters

In the first example in this article, one may look through medical records to find approximately how many people are known to be hit by meteors per century, and from that information create a statistic to estimate the probabilities. A strict frequentist will stop there, most statisticians will allow non-statisticial information to be used to arrive at what would be considered the best available distribution to model the problem. Such information would include knowledge and intuition about peoples tendency to consult doctors after accidents, the comprehensiveness of the records and so on.



References

  • [1]Person actually hit by a meteorite.


See also


Related topics

External links