Talk:Annapolis Conference: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Frank van Geelkerken No edit summary |
imported>Steve Mount No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian and US law.<br> | It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian and US law.<br> | ||
Maybe '''<nowiki>[[Category:Law US]]</nowiki>''' in this case? [[User:Frank van Geelkerken|Frank]] May 2nd 2007 | Maybe '''<nowiki>[[Category:Law US]]</nowiki>''' in this case? [[User:Frank van Geelkerken|Frank]] May 2nd 2007 | ||
:Actually, I just copied the categories from another page I did - in this case, I don't think the law category is appropriate and I'm going to remove it. If there is any disagreement, put it back and we should take Frank's suggestion into account. [[User:Steve Mount|Steve Mount]] 19:12, 2 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:12, 2 May 2007
I included a link to a copy of the Annapolis Conference report which is contained on my site. Could someone please take a look at the link (in the References section) and confirm that I have used it properly? I intended to confirm to the policy of no such links, but I couldn't figure out a good way to place a link place-holder. Thanks. Steve Mount 00:10, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian and US law.
Maybe [[Category:Law US]] in this case? Frank May 2nd 2007
- Actually, I just copied the categories from another page I did - in this case, I don't think the law category is appropriate and I'm going to remove it. If there is any disagreement, put it back and we should take Frank's suggestion into account. Steve Mount 19:12, 2 May 2007 (CDT)