Talk:International System of Units: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park (→Kind of like Wikipedia article: new section) |
imported>Paul Wormer |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think that the direction this article is going at isn't what Citizendium articles are supposed to be like. It contains a 2-sentence introduction & then goes straight into the tables. History, background, why it came to be used, who were behind it, etc. should be included. & the tables make the article look really confusing. We should have the tables in some auto-hide format (similar to the templates in Wikipedia that you click to expand). ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 11:13, 29 November 2007 (CST)) | I think that the direction this article is going at isn't what Citizendium articles are supposed to be like. It contains a 2-sentence introduction & then goes straight into the tables. History, background, why it came to be used, who were behind it, etc. should be included. & the tables make the article look really confusing. We should have the tables in some auto-hide format (similar to the templates in Wikipedia that you click to expand). ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 11:13, 29 November 2007 (CST)) | ||
:I disagree, this article is very useful, exactly because of its tables. It probably gives too much credit to Wikipedia, though, because I would guess that the tables are a fairly straightforward copy of tables provided by NIST or standardization committees.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 08:42, 20 May 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 07:42, 20 May 2008
Kind of like Wikipedia article
I think that the direction this article is going at isn't what Citizendium articles are supposed to be like. It contains a 2-sentence introduction & then goes straight into the tables. History, background, why it came to be used, who were behind it, etc. should be included. & the tables make the article look really confusing. We should have the tables in some auto-hide format (similar to the templates in Wikipedia that you click to expand). (Chunbum Park 11:13, 29 November 2007 (CST))
- I disagree, this article is very useful, exactly because of its tables. It probably gives too much credit to Wikipedia, though, because I would guess that the tables are a fairly straightforward copy of tables provided by NIST or standardization committees.--Paul Wormer 08:42, 20 May 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Chemistry Developed Articles
- Chemistry Advanced Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Engineering Developed Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag