Talk:Reproducibility: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist; ditch the JIR link)
imported>Gareth Leng
Line 17: Line 17:
==Ditch the JIR link?==
==Ditch the JIR link?==
It seems to me that the ''Journal of Irreproducible Results'', despite the name, really isn't topical here. [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
It seems to me that the ''Journal of Irreproducible Results'', despite the name, really isn't topical here. [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
I noticed that this article appeared not to be describing science as it is performed (at least in my experience), so have begun to alter it.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 09:39, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:39, 7 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Reproducibility"
Workgroup category or categories Library and Information Science Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





The "wikipedia" template is redundant and therefore deprecated now. Please check the "Content is from Wikipedia?" box.

In fact, if you look at [1] you'll see that only a few Wikipedia-sourced articles use this template; we should delete all instances, and make sure the box is checked. --Larry Sanger 18:24, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

Ditch the JIR link?

It seems to me that the Journal of Irreproducible Results, despite the name, really isn't topical here. Petréa Mitchell 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

I noticed that this article appeared not to be describing science as it is performed (at least in my experience), so have begun to alter it.Gareth Leng 09:39, 7 September 2007 (CDT)