Talk:Surface (geometry): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Catherine Woodgold (Are surfaces necessarily infinite?) |
imported>Greg Woodhouse (Are surfaces necessarily infinite? - it depends) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Is a surface only something like a plane or sphere, which has no edges, or would one face of a cube count as a surface? If a surface necessarily has no edges, isn't it misleading to say it has length and breadth? --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 20:20, 27 April 2007 (CDT) | Is a surface only something like a plane or sphere, which has no edges, or would one face of a cube count as a surface? If a surface necessarily has no edges, isn't it misleading to say it has length and breadth? --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 20:20, 27 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I think the point here is that surfaces are 2-dimensional. In algebraic geometry, you can consider surfaces defined over arbitrartry fields (even finite ones), but in differfdential geometry you're pretty much limited to R (or C). But even in the case of algebraic surfaces, you usually work over an algebraically closed field and then talk about points definable (or "rational") over a subfield. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 21:37, 27 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:37, 27 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --AlekStos 14:46, 26 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Are surfaces necessarily infinite?
Is a surface only something like a plane or sphere, which has no edges, or would one face of a cube count as a surface? If a surface necessarily has no edges, isn't it misleading to say it has length and breadth? --Catherine Woodgold 20:20, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
- I think the point here is that surfaces are 2-dimensional. In algebraic geometry, you can consider surfaces defined over arbitrartry fields (even finite ones), but in differfdential geometry you're pretty much limited to R (or C). But even in the case of algebraic surfaces, you usually work over an algebraically closed field and then talk about points definable (or "rational") over a subfield. Greg Woodhouse 21:37, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Mathematics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup