Talk:First Punic War: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Rob Glass No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Questions: why are they called "Punic"? And: what are our (classical) sources for this history? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:12, 12 March 2007 (CDT) | Questions: why are they called "Punic"? And: what are our (classical) sources for this history? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:12, 12 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
:They're Punic because the Roman name for the Carthaginians was ''poenici'' or ''punici'', and the classical sources are numerous but the primary ones are Polybius (who I do have sourced on this page) Titus Livius "livy" (the translation of which I do not have with me) Diodorus Siculus (ditto), Apppian (ditto), and Dionysus of Halicanarsus (who probably isn't even owning) amongst others (and probably one or two major ones which I'm forgetting from this top of my head list.) If you'd like I could find translations of them online and source them as well. --[[User:Rob Glass|Rob Glass]] 19:01, 12 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:01, 12 March 2007
Questions: why are they called "Punic"? And: what are our (classical) sources for this history? --Larry Sanger 17:12, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
- They're Punic because the Roman name for the Carthaginians was poenici or punici, and the classical sources are numerous but the primary ones are Polybius (who I do have sourced on this page) Titus Livius "livy" (the translation of which I do not have with me) Diodorus Siculus (ditto), Apppian (ditto), and Dionysus of Halicanarsus (who probably isn't even owning) amongst others (and probably one or two major ones which I'm forgetting from this top of my head list.) If you'd like I could find translations of them online and source them as well. --Rob Glass 19:01, 12 March 2007 (CDT)