Talk:RNA interference/Draft

RNA interference

Current talk page

Archive 1

Article re-approval and version record area

Article re-approval and version record area

---

Approval process for RNA interference Article re-approval and version record area Reserved for a log of event re-approval of horizontal gene transfer and template records. See here for help. This is a collection of minor error corrections and typs. No matter of substance. I consider this is purely an editorial action. One editor approval should be adequate . David Tribe 06:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT) Version 1 approval (Tribe, Leng, Sculerati) After further editing that has occurred subsequent to conversations between Tribe and Leng, Tribe and SchuleratiI think its time to place this template with a one week period before the deadline. I see the whole process as a system of checks and balances with trade offs between our goals . I will update the URL pointer as various copy edits come in David Tribe 23:48, 6 February 2007 (CST) David Tribe nominated this version of this article for approval. The Biology Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, February 16, 2007. Melded in bypassed Chris day edit suggestions in response to his talk comment. My reference change in seen in his diff link was deliberate, omitting a dead link and citing Ann Reviews more consistently ( I hope ). I will return to his comments to ensure none are ignored (Ci speriamo, il mio amico) David Tribe 01:39, 10 February 2007 (CST) Extended approval period to 16 Feb 2007 to allow time for Chris day's edits already discussed David Tribe 20:34, 11 February 2007 (CST) All substantive issues raised in approval (Day, Klode) period are addressed. URL pointer updatedDavid Tribe 18:59, 18 February 2007 (CST) Version 1.1 approval David Tribe nominated this version of this article for approval. The Biology Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, April 20, 2007. Straightforward correction of minor errors (bug fix) no substantial changes. Short approval time satisfactory David Tribe 07:06, 17 April 2007 (CDT) Next version Begins here..

hello

Good evening. I did some copy editing. There was a comma and a further plural issue which I decided not to change, thinking that these may have been intentional. Again the approved version contains the same errors which I have corrected. William Hart 07:32, 20 February 2007 (CST)

why the disclaimer?

why the disclaimer in the approved box? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 21:03, 12 April 2007 (CDT)

See the discussion here: Template_talk:Approved Chris Day (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2007 (CDT)