Talk:Fence plowing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos (chklist) |
imported>Aleksander Stos m (stub? non-stub?) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = y | | cat_check = y | ||
| status = | | status = 3 | ||
| underlinked = y | | underlinked = y | ||
| cleanup = y | | cleanup = y |
Revision as of 07:47, 10 March 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Sociology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --AlekStos 07:43, 10 March 2007 (CST) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Issues
- Does this article belong here at all? It is fun to write and to read, but it is possibly quite ephemeral. Hard to imagine fence plowing being an on-going fad.
- The link to the video clip of the Fox News interview is questionable. I couldn't find the story on the Fox New site, perhaps on the local Channel 5 site.
- No link to the New York Times articles as after 2 weeks they charge for access.
- Who is the expert who would review or approve such an article?
Fred Bauder 13:53, 18 February 2007 (CST)
- the first and the last question could probably be answered by the Sociology Workgroup, which is proposed as the "supervisor" for the article. --AlekStos 07:43, 10 March 2007 (CST)
Categories:
- Sociology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Sociology Advanced Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Sociology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Sociology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Sociology External Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Sociology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup