Talk:Justice: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Winston Gee
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 17: Line 17:


:The numerous sections are a little on the short side and disrupt the '"narrative coherence and flow" of the article, I feel.  -- [[User:Winston Gee|Winston Gee]] 22:48, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
:The numerous sections are a little on the short side and disrupt the '"narrative coherence and flow" of the article, I feel.  -- [[User:Winston Gee|Winston Gee]] 22:48, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
If we have used even a single sentence from Wikipedia that Sam Clark didn't write, we must credit WP.  Is there any such sentence? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 23:08, 6 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:08, 6 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Justice"
Workgroup category or categories Philosophy Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 22:03, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Created page

Created page from wikipedia entry. I feel OK about this, because I wrote 95% of the WP entry (although I may not have noticed all of the edit creep since I last looked at it). Cheers, Sam Clark 09:00, 11 February 2007 (CST)

If you wrote 95% of the WP entry, I suggest that you go back to the version you were last involved in (probably this one or maybe this) copy and paste it and we can ditch the reference to Wikipedia. If you have a copy elsewhere (I usually keep a copy in a word processor) that's even better. Ori Redler 02:45, 14 February 2007 (CST)

The numerous sections are a little on the short side and disrupt the '"narrative coherence and flow" of the article, I feel. -- Winston Gee 22:48, 6 May 2007 (CDT)

If we have used even a single sentence from Wikipedia that Sam Clark didn't write, we must credit WP. Is there any such sentence? --Larry Sanger 23:08, 6 May 2007 (CDT)