Talk:Snake (animal): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD
No edit summary
imported>India Williams
(adding checklist template and filling out what I know)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Snake
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = Y
|              status = 2
|        underlinked =
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:India Williams|India Williams]] 18:11, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me![[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me![[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST)



Revision as of 17:11, 10 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Snake (animal)"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Not specified
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by India Williams 18:11, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me!Nancy Sculerati MD 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Removed line about "old synonym for snakes". It's perfectly acceptable to call a snake a serpent, this is a current synonym. Nancy Sculerati MD 10:05, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Format: Derivation and use of word/triple line/Body of article

I would like to make a case for adopting this as Citizendium style. I think it has the advantage of keeping all the word origin and use stuff, but- especially if it became standard and users would learn that the actual article starts after the triple line- not muddying up the introduction with this stuff. Nancy Sculerati MD 10:09, 29 January 2007 (CST)


As I am editing this article I am finding a number of direct quotation from sources that are not placed in quotes and are not referenced. Therefore, I am deleting them as I go. No original research does not mean no original writing ;-) !!Nancy Sculerati MD 10:17, 29 January 2007 (CST)