Talk:Central dogma of molecular genetics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD
No edit summary
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Central dogma, the
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 22:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
Is the hypothesis ''now'' generally referred to as "the central dogma" or is the name itself merely a bit of historical trivia?  Also, is the term usually capitalized, The Central Dogma (as in the text of this article)?  If so, then the article needs to be moved (click on "move") to [[The Central Dogma]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:36, 28 January 2007 (CST)
Is the hypothesis ''now'' generally referred to as "the central dogma" or is the name itself merely a bit of historical trivia?  Also, is the term usually capitalized, The Central Dogma (as in the text of this article)?  If so, then the article needs to be moved (click on "move") to [[The Central Dogma]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:36, 28 January 2007 (CST)


The phrase comes up so much in current biology that the article is not just trivia, it will hellp many people understand the introductory text in various molecular biology and cell biolgy (and other) articles. I'm not sure, but I think it should be formatted in a title case.I'm not sure enough to move it, though. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:40, 28 January 2007 (CST)
The phrase comes up so much in current biology that the article is not just trivia, it will hellp many people understand the introductory text in various molecular biology and cell biolgy (and other) articles. I'm not sure, but I think it should be formatted in a title case.I'm not sure enough to move it, though. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:40, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 21:05, 27 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Central dogma of molecular genetics"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 22:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.




Is the hypothesis now generally referred to as "the central dogma" or is the name itself merely a bit of historical trivia? Also, is the term usually capitalized, The Central Dogma (as in the text of this article)? If so, then the article needs to be moved (click on "move") to The Central Dogma. --Larry Sanger 09:36, 28 January 2007 (CST)

The phrase comes up so much in current biology that the article is not just trivia, it will hellp many people understand the introductory text in various molecular biology and cell biolgy (and other) articles. I'm not sure, but I think it should be formatted in a title case.I'm not sure enough to move it, though. Nancy Sculerati MD 09:40, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Central_dogma_of_molecular_genetics&oldid=127273"