Talk:Charles Darwin: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(Moving category to main page)
imported>Kevin M I Schutte
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Darwin, Charles
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 = History
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:46, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
This is the main article for a group of subpages, all of which were written carefully by an amateur but based on one of the references (Desmond) and taking its style. It needs to be therefore rewritten, with other sources in mind.
This is the main article for a group of subpages, all of which were written carefully by an amateur but based on one of the references (Desmond) and taking its style. It needs to be therefore rewritten, with other sources in mind.
[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 23:37, 21 November 2006 (CST)
[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 23:37, 21 November 2006 (CST)
There has been considerable rewriting since the last comment, & it would probably be advisable to wait a few weeks[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 01:08, 25 November 2006 (CST)
There has been considerable rewriting since the last comment, & it would probably be advisable to wait a few weeks[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 01:08, 25 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 20:46, 8 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Charles Darwin"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup, History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Kevin M I Schutte 21:46, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This is the main article for a group of subpages, all of which were written carefully by an amateur but based on one of the references (Desmond) and taking its style. It needs to be therefore rewritten, with other sources in mind. DavidGoodman 23:37, 21 November 2006 (CST) There has been considerable rewriting since the last comment, & it would probably be advisable to wait a few weeksDavidGoodman 01:08, 25 November 2006 (CST)