CZ:Economics Workgroup: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Line 4: Line 4:
== A CALL TO ECONOMICS AUTHORS AND EDITORS ==
== A CALL TO ECONOMICS AUTHORS AND EDITORS ==


'''We need much more activity on CZ with social science, and especially economics articles'''. A new author here, Nick Gardner, has made a heroic start with some core Economics articles. We transferred the text from the old article [[Economics]] to a new article [[History of Economic Thought]] which now requires massive editing to put it in shape. There are also some other articles which need attention. I propose listing articles into several categories, to guide us through the workload.
'''We need much more activity on CZ with social science, and especially economics articles'''. A new author here, Nick Gardner, has made a heroic start with some core Economics articles. We transferred the text from the old article [[Economics]] to a new article [[History_of_Economic_Thought]] which now requires massive editing to put it in shape. There are also some other articles which need attention. I propose listing articles into several categories, to guide us through the workload.


Please add any articles you would like to nominate for these groupings [and feel free to start work on them too!]
Please add any articles you would like to nominate for these groupings [and feel free to start work on them too!]
Line 34: Line 34:


Below, I also paste a message from Nick, about his recent edits on some core economics articles. We hope that we can put together a really good economics coverage on CZ.--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 20:10, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
Below, I also paste a message from Nick, about his recent edits on some core economics articles. We hope that we can put together a really good economics coverage on CZ.--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 20:10, 23 September 2007 (CDT)


== New articles ==
== New articles ==

Revision as of 19:12, 23 September 2007

Workgroups are no longer used for group communications, but they still are used to group articles into fields of interest. Each article is assigned to 1-3 Workgroups via the article's Metadata.

Economics Workgroup
Economics article All articles (363) To Approve (0) Editors: active (0) / inactive (13)
and
Authors: active (172) / inactive (0)
Workgroup Discussion
Recent changes Citable Articles (12)
Subgroups (5)
Checklist-generated categories:

Subpage categories:

Missing subpage categories:

Article statuses:


A CALL TO ECONOMICS AUTHORS AND EDITORS

We need much more activity on CZ with social science, and especially economics articles. A new author here, Nick Gardner, has made a heroic start with some core Economics articles. We transferred the text from the old article Economics to a new article History_of_Economic_Thought which now requires massive editing to put it in shape. There are also some other articles which need attention. I propose listing articles into several categories, to guide us through the workload.

Please add any articles you would like to nominate for these groupings [and feel free to start work on them too!]


Core economics articles which are completely MISSING


Core economics articles which are stubs or low quality


Core economics articles which are good but need development to reach approval standard



Economics articles which seem redundant but whose content may be useful for other articles Economics subdisciplines History of ancient economics


Economics articles which appear to be finished, of very high quality, and may be ready for formal Editor approval



Below, I also paste a message from Nick, about his recent edits on some core economics articles. We hope that we can put together a really good economics coverage on CZ.--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 20:10, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

New articles

I have made a tentative start at writing new articles on Economics, Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.

I have aimed them at the ordinary reader seeking a broad appreciation of what it's about rather than at students of economics looking for help with their essays. I leave the task of meeting students' needs to those of you that are in the teaching profession. I suggest putting that material in a separate article titled (perhaps) " Economic Theory"

Please let me have your comments and criticisms.

Nick Gardner 15:33, 23 September 2007 (CDT)