Talk:Conduct of the War (7–9 May 1940): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) (probably need to rename this article "Norway Debate" without "The") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== needs renaming, I think == | == needs renaming, I think == | ||
I think this article needs to be called "Norway Debate" instead of "The Norway Debate", otherwise no one will ever find it. What do you think? [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 09:26, 31 May 2023 (CDT) | I think this article needs to be called "Norway Debate" instead of "The Norway Debate", otherwise no one will ever find it. What do you think? [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 09:26, 31 May 2023 (CDT) | ||
:I'd actually prefer to use a longer title, '''Conduct of the War – the Norway Debate''', because "Conduct of the War" is the official title but the media has always called it the Norway Debate. I don't mind either way. It's really a question of whether titles should be short and snappy, or more descriptive. [[User:John Leach|John]] ([[User talk:John Leach|talk]]) 10:30, 31 May 2023 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:30, 31 May 2023
needs renaming, I think
I think this article needs to be called "Norway Debate" instead of "The Norway Debate", otherwise no one will ever find it. What do you think? Pat Palmer (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2023 (CDT)
- I'd actually prefer to use a longer title, Conduct of the War – the Norway Debate, because "Conduct of the War" is the official title but the media has always called it the Norway Debate. I don't mind either way. It's really a question of whether titles should be short and snappy, or more descriptive. John (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2023 (CDT)