Alaric A. Piette: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "lawfare" to "lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an article about Lawfare.<ref>")
Tag: Reverted
Line 2: Line 2:
Lieutenant '''Alaric Piette''' is an officer in the [[United States Navy]].
Lieutenant '''Alaric Piette''' is an officer in the [[United States Navy]].
He is a former [[Navy SEAL]] who went on to earn a law degree and become a defense attorney for the U.S. Navy JAG Corps.
He is a former [[Navy SEAL]] who went on to earn a law degree and become a defense attorney for the U.S. Navy JAG Corps.
When he was appointed a defense counsel for [[Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri]] in his [[Guantanamo Military Commission]], Piette's lack of experience triggered comment.  Multiple civilian lawyers volunteered to help defend Al Nashiri, but they all resigned in protest after learning that clandestine listening devices had been used to eavesdrop on their privileged conversations with Al Nashiri.<ref name=usnews2018-10-12/>  Their resignations left Piette as the Al Nashiri's sole counsel.<ref name=lawfareblog2019-04-16/>
When he was appointed a defense counsel for [[Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri]] in his [[Guantanamo Military Commission]], Piette's lack of experience triggered comment.  Multiple civilian lawyers volunteered to help defend Al Nashiri, but they all resigned in protest after learning that clandestine listening devices had been used to eavesdrop on their privileged conversations with Al Nashiri.<ref name=usnews2018-10-12/>  Their resignations left Piette as the Al Nashiri's sole counsel.<ref name=lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an [[Wikipedia:Lawfare|article about Lawfare]].<ref>blog2019-04-16/>


Since Al Nashiri might face the death penalty if he were convicted, at least one of his lawyers was supposed to be a "[[learned counsel]]" - a lawyer with special qualifications for death penalty cases.<ref name=lawfareblog2019-04-16/> Piette filed a request for the pre-trial hearings be paused until another learned counsel could be found.<ref name=americanbar2017-12-01/>  The judge dismissed the request, until [[Emily Olson-Gault]], the director of the [[American Bar Association]] testified.  She assured the judge that a learned counsel was indeed necessary for even pre-trial hearings in a death penalty case.
Since Al Nashiri might face the death penalty if he were convicted, at least one of his lawyers was supposed to be a "[[learned counsel]]" - a lawyer with special qualifications for death penalty cases.<ref name=lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an [[Wikipedia:Lawfare|article about Lawfare]].<ref>blog2019-04-16/> Piette filed a request for the pre-trial hearings be paused until another learned counsel could be found.<ref name=americanbar2017-12-01/>  The judge dismissed the request, until [[Emily Olson-Gault]], the director of the [[American Bar Association]] testified.  She assured the judge that a learned counsel was indeed necessary for even pre-trial hearings in a death penalty case.


In 2019, the New York Times published an article alleging that Piette had been passed over for promotion, a potentially career-ending matter, and that his lack of promotion might be retribution because of his decision to represent a person on death row at Guantanamo Bay<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/22/us/politics/navy-lawyer-promotion-guantanamo.html Military Lawyer Denied Promotion While Defending Qaeda Suspect], in the New York Times 8-22/2019, last access 5/24/2022</ref>.
In 2019, the New York Times published an article alleging that Piette had been passed over for promotion, a potentially career-ending matter, and that his lack of promotion might be retribution because of his decision to represent a person on death row at Guantanamo Bay<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/22/us/politics/navy-lawyer-promotion-guantanamo.html Military Lawyer Denied Promotion While Defending Qaeda Suspect], in the New York Times 8-22/2019, last access 5/24/2022</ref>.
Line 164: Line 164:
</ref>
</ref>


<ref name=lawfareblog2019-04-16>
<ref name=lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an [[Wikipedia:Lawfare|article about Lawfare]].<ref>blog2019-04-16>
{{cite news     
{{cite news     
| url        = https://www.lawfareblog.com/summary-dc-circuit-vacates-military-judges-rulings-al-nashiri
| url        = https://www.lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an [[Wikipedia:Lawfare|article about Lawfare]].<ref>blog.com/summary-dc-circuit-vacates-military-judges-rulings-al-nashiri
| title      = Summary: D.C. Circuit Vacates Military Judge’s Rulings in Al-Nashiri
| title      = Summary: D.C. Circuit Vacates Military Judge’s Rulings in Al-Nashiri
| work        = [[lawfare]]
| work        = [[lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an [[Wikipedia:Lawfare|article about Lawfare]].<ref>]]
| author      = Sarah Grant
| author      = Sarah Grant
| date        = 2019-04-16
| date        = 2019-04-16

Revision as of 13:39, 7 June 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Lieutenant Alaric Piette is an officer in the United States Navy. He is a former Navy SEAL who went on to earn a law degree and become a defense attorney for the U.S. Navy JAG Corps. When he was appointed a defense counsel for Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri in his Guantanamo Military Commission, Piette's lack of experience triggered comment. Multiple civilian lawyers volunteered to help defend Al Nashiri, but they all resigned in protest after learning that clandestine listening devices had been used to eavesdrop on their privileged conversations with Al Nashiri.[1] Their resignations left Piette as the Al Nashiri's sole counsel.Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.

References

  1. Court Says Trial in USS Cole Attack Can Resume at Guantamamo, US News and World Report, 2018-10-12. Retrieved on 2019-08-23. “A defense attorney who did not quit, Navy Lt. Alaric Piette, said he expects pretrial hearings to resume.”
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "americanbar2017-12-01" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.