Nuclear power reconsidered/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
== Controversial articles ==
== Controversial articles ==
*Abbott, D. (2016) "Nuclear Power: Game Over", AQ: Australian Quarterly, 87(4), 8–16,40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24877873
*Abbott, D. (2016) "Nuclear Power: Game Over", AQ: Australian Quarterly, 87(4), 8–16,40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24877873
*Sovacool, et al.(2020) Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nat Energy 5, 928–935 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3
*Nordhaus (2021) [https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/on-anti-nuclear-bullshit On Anti-Nuclear Bullshit]
*Lyman, E., (2021) "Advanced Isn’t Always Better 'Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors', Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf
*Jacobson, M., et.al. (2022) "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage", Renewable Energy, 184, 430-442. https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/21-USStates-PDFs/21-USStatesPaper.pdf
*Jacobson, M., et.al. (2022) "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage", Renewable Energy, 184, 430-442. https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/21-USStates-PDFs/21-USStatesPaper.pdf
*Lovins, Amory (2022) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/26/amory-lovins-energy-efficiency-interview-cheapest-safest-cleanest-crisis
*Lovins, Amory (2022) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/26/amory-lovins-energy-efficiency-interview-cheapest-safest-cleanest-crisis
*Lyman, E., (2021) "Advanced Isn’t Always Better 'Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors', Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf
*Sovacool, B.K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A. et al. Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nat Energy 5, 928–935 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3
*https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/on-anti-nuclear-bullshit


== Anti-nuclear organizations ==
== Anti-nuclear organizations ==

Revision as of 08:37, 7 June 2022

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
A hand-picked, annotated list of Web resources about Nuclear power reconsidered.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.

Controversial articles

Anti-nuclear organizations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-nuclear_organizations

Public figures who reconsidered nuclear power

  • Stewart Brand, creator of "The Whole Earth Catalog", from the NY Times Business section, 3-23-2022
  • Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, from the Guardian, 11-16-2021
  • Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and CEO of Tesla, from CNBC on 7/22/2021
  • Michael Shellenberger An environmental activist, talk at TEDxDanubia 2019.
  • Kirsty Gogan An environmental activist, anti-nuclear "by default" speaking at Alberta Nuclear Power - Calgary Panel.