Pay for performance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett No edit summary |
imported>Robert Badgett |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Studies of effectiveness== | ==Studies of effectiveness== | ||
Controlled studies show conflicting results.<ref name="doi10.1056/NEJMsa1114951">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1056/NEJMsa1114951 | issn = 0028-4793 | volume = 367 | issue = 19 | pages = 1821-1828 | last = Sutton | first = Matt | coauthors = Silviya Nikolova, Ruth Boaden, Helen Lester, Ruth McDonald, Martin Roland | title = Reduced Mortality with Hospital Pay for Performance in England | journal = New England Journal of Medicine | accessdate = 2012-11-08 | date = 2012 | url = http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1114951 }}</ref><ref name="pmid17259444">{{cite journal| author=Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A et al.| title=Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2007 | volume= 356 | issue= 5 | pages= 486-96 | pmid=17259444 | doi=10.1056/NEJMsa064964 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17259444 }} </ref> | Controlled studies show conflicting results.<ref name="doi10.1056/NEJMsa1114951">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1056/NEJMsa1114951 | issn = 0028-4793 | volume = 367 | issue = 19 | pages = 1821-1828 | last = Sutton | first = Matt | coauthors = Silviya Nikolova, Ruth Boaden, Helen Lester, Ruth McDonald, Martin Roland | title = Reduced Mortality with Hospital Pay for Performance in England | journal = New England Journal of Medicine | accessdate = 2012-11-08 | date = 2012 | url = http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1114951 }}</ref><ref name="pmid17259444">{{cite journal| author=Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A et al.| title=Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2007 | volume= 356 | issue= 5 | pages= 486-96 | pmid=17259444 | doi=10.1056/NEJMsa064964 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17259444 }} </ref><ref name="pmid22455751">{{cite journal| author=Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM| title=The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2012 | volume= 366 | issue= 17 | pages= 1606-15 | pmid=22455751 | doi=10.1056/NEJMsa1112351 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22455751 }} </ref> | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Sutton et al<ref name="doi10.1056/NEJMsa1114951"/><br/>2012 ||24 English hospitals compared to 132 control hospitals <br/>U.K.||Bonuses averaged $312,000<br/>"hospital leadership agreed to invest awarded money internally toward efforts to improve clinical care"<br/>U.K.||No intervention|| 30-day in-hospital mortality for patients admitted for [[pneumonia]], [[heart failure]], or acute [[myocardial infarction]]|| Baseline: 20.9%<br/>Follow-up: 20.1%|| Baseline: 13.1%<br/>Follow-up: 12.1%|| Hospitals included in the program had higher baseline mortality. | | Sutton et al<ref name="doi10.1056/NEJMsa1114951"/><br/>2012 ||24 English hospitals compared to 132 control hospitals <br/>U.K.||Bonuses averaged $312,000<br/>"hospital leadership agreed to invest awarded money internally toward efforts to improve clinical care"<br/>U.K.||No intervention|| 30-day in-hospital mortality for patients admitted for [[pneumonia]], [[heart failure]], or acute [[myocardial infarction]]|| Baseline: 20.9%<br/>Follow-up: 20.1%|| Baseline: 13.1%<br/>Follow-up: 12.1%|| Hospitals included in the program had higher baseline mortality. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| HQID<ref name="pmid17259444"/><br/>2007 || 207 hospitals that voluntarily participated in the HQID project among 613 hospitals that voluntarily participated in a CMS Hospital Quality Alliance (HQA)project for public reporting of outcomes<br/>U.S.A.||Bonuses that averaged $71,960 per year per hospital (for two years)||No intervention|| 30-day mortality after 6 years for admitted for [[pneumonia]], [[heart failure]], acute [[myocardial infarction]] or [[coronary artery bypass]]|| 11.8%|| 11.6%|| | | HQID<ref name="pmid17259444"/><ref name="pmid22455751"/><br/>2007 || 207 hospitals that voluntarily participated in the HQID project among 613 hospitals that voluntarily participated in a CMS Hospital Quality Alliance (HQA)project for public reporting of outcomes<br/>U.S.A.||Bonuses that averaged $71,960 per year per hospital (for two years)||No intervention|| 30-day mortality after 6 years for admitted for [[pneumonia]], [[heart failure]], acute [[myocardial infarction]] or [[coronary artery bypass]]|| 11.8%|| 11.6%|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 08:00, 8 November 2012
In health care delivery, pay for performance, also called incentive reimbursement, is "a scheme which provides reimbursement for the health services rendered, generally by an institution, and which provides added financial rewards if certain conditions are met. Such a scheme is intended to promote and reward increased efficiency and cost containment, with better care, or at least without adverse effect on the quality of the care rendered."[1]
Pay for performance is an important component of health care reform.
Studies of effectiveness
Controlled studies show conflicting results.[2][3][4]
| Trial | Hospitals | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome | Results | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||||||
| Sutton et al[2] 2012 |
24 English hospitals compared to 132 control hospitals U.K. |
Bonuses averaged $312,000 "hospital leadership agreed to invest awarded money internally toward efforts to improve clinical care" U.K. |
No intervention | 30-day in-hospital mortality for patients admitted for pneumonia, heart failure, or acute myocardial infarction | Baseline: 20.9% Follow-up: 20.1% |
Baseline: 13.1% Follow-up: 12.1% |
Hospitals included in the program had higher baseline mortality. |
| HQID[3][4] 2007 |
207 hospitals that voluntarily participated in the HQID project among 613 hospitals that voluntarily participated in a CMS Hospital Quality Alliance (HQA)project for public reporting of outcomes U.S.A. |
Bonuses that averaged $71,960 per year per hospital (for two years) | No intervention | 30-day mortality after 6 years for admitted for pneumonia, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass | 11.8% | 11.6% | |
References
- ↑ Anonymous (2024), Pay for performance (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Sutton, Matt; Silviya Nikolova, Ruth Boaden, Helen Lester, Ruth McDonald, Martin Roland (2012). "Reduced Mortality with Hospital Pay for Performance in England". New England Journal of Medicine 367 (19): 1821-1828. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa1114951. ISSN 0028-4793. Retrieved on 2012-11-08. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A et al. (2007). "Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.". N Engl J Med 356 (5): 486-96. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa064964. PMID 17259444. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM (2012). "The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.". N Engl J Med 366 (17): 1606-15. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa1112351. PMID 22455751. Research Blogging.