Fiscal multiplier: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Estimates== | ==Estimates== | ||
Economists views about the size of the fiscal multiplier have been associated with their opinions about [[Keynesian economics]] - a subject on which they differ widely. The post-war consensus in favour of discretionary fiscal policy was associated with an implied assumption of a multiplier substantially above one, and the subsequent consensus in favour of the use of [[monetary policy]] implicitly assumed a fractional or negligible fiscal multiplier. Discretionary fiscal policy found favour again following the [[crash of 2008]] with the prospect of a [[recession]] too deep to be managed by reducing interests to their zero bound. The advice to President Obama by Christine Romer (chair of his Council of Economic Advisors) implied a multiplier of about 1.6, but Professor Barro argued on [[a priori]] grounds that, on the contrary, its peacetime value was near zero. | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Christine Romer has argued that that it is "incredibly hard" to estimate the value of a multiplier because fiscal actions are often taken in response to other things happening in the economy, and separating the impact of those other factors from the impact of fiscal change very difficult. Failure to do so can result in [[omitted-variable bias]] resulting in an underestimate of the multiplier - an error that Ms Romer believes to be common. | |||
<ref>[http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~cromer/Written%20Version%20of%20Effects%20of%20Fiscal%20Policy.pdf Christina D. Romer: ''What do we know about the effects of fiscal policy?'', Lecture at Hamilton College, November 7, 2011]</ref> | <ref>[http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~cromer/Written%20Version%20of%20Effects%20of%20Fiscal%20Policy.pdf Christina D. Romer: ''What do we know about the effects of fiscal policy?'', Lecture at Hamilton College, November 7, 2011]</ref> | ||
Revision as of 16:14, 11 November 2012
The fiscal multiplier is the factor which relates an increase or decrease in real GDP, to the decrease or increase in the country's budget balance, that causes it.
Theoretical background
The multiplier effect model is an extension of the basic spending multiplier model that relaxes the simplifying assumptions of that model. In doing so, it extends an identity, that was concerned with the multiplicative effect of circular monetary flows, to create a relationship between a monetary injection and the consequent change in real (inflation-corrected) GDP. The outcome, though still termed "the multiplier", is a factor that is not necessarily greater than one, and whose value is dependent upon a range of behavioural and environmental influences. Theoretical considerations suggest that the size of the multiplier is influenced by an economy's exchange rate regime, its openness to trade, the effectiveness of its monetary policy, the degree of access to credit, and the states of consumer and investor expectations[1]. Its magnitude may be expected to depend critically upon the amount of unused capacity in an economy, and it is expected to be larger than average when the economy is in recession. Available theory provides little guidance as to the relative magnitude of those influences, however.
Applications
The fiscal multiplier is not just a component of economic forecasting models: it is also one of the determinants of fiscal policy. It determines the size of the fiscal stimulus necessary to counter a given recession. It determines the extent to which the benefits of fiscal consolidation are offset by reductions in output and employment. Also, by allowing for the resulting falls in tax revenue and rises in welfare payments, it can set a limit upon the rate of fiscal consolidation above which it would cause an increase - rather than the intended reduction - in the level of public debt.
Estimates
Economists views about the size of the fiscal multiplier have been associated with their opinions about Keynesian economics - a subject on which they differ widely. The post-war consensus in favour of discretionary fiscal policy was associated with an implied assumption of a multiplier substantially above one, and the subsequent consensus in favour of the use of monetary policy implicitly assumed a fractional or negligible fiscal multiplier. Discretionary fiscal policy found favour again following the crash of 2008 with the prospect of a recession too deep to be managed by reducing interests to their zero bound. The advice to President Obama by Christine Romer (chair of his Council of Economic Advisors) implied a multiplier of about 1.6, but Professor Barro argued on a priori grounds that, on the contrary, its peacetime value was near zero.