Talk:Freedom of religion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
mNo edit summary
imported>Peter Jackson
m (template)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
The third sentence touches on, but does not develop, the question whether a human right can be absolute - a question that is also neglected in the [[Human rights]] article.  It is argued [http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/what-are-human-rights/how-do-human-rights-work/ here] and [http://www.bihr.org.uk/human-rights-in-action/chapter-3-different-rights-%E2%80%93-a-balancing-act here] that most are not, and it is argued [http://www.ourcivilisation.com/cooray/btof/chap225.htm here] that none are. It seems strange to ignore the well-documented  debate on that  issue. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 14:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
The third sentence touches on, but does not develop, the question whether a human right can be absolute - a question that is also neglected in the [[Human rights]] article.  It is argued [http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/what-are-human-rights/how-do-human-rights-work/ here] and [http://www.bihr.org.uk/human-rights-in-action/chapter-3-different-rights-%E2%80%93-a-balancing-act here] that most are not, and it is argued [http://www.ourcivilisation.com/cooray/btof/chap225.htm here] that none are. It seems strange to ignore the well-documented  debate on that  issue. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 14:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


:Not sure what you mean here. The third sentence is the one quoting the UDHR. The article says no one would claim ''this'' right is absolute. The more general discussion belongs in the more general article. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
:Not sure what you mean here. The third sentence is the one quoting the UDHR. The article says no one would claim ''this'' right is absolute. The more general discussion belongs in the more general article. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:28, 2 August 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Definition [?]
 Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Law, Politics and Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English
To do.

Metadata here


The third sentence touches on, but does not develop, the question whether a human right can be absolute - a question that is also neglected in the Human rights article. It is argued here and here that most are not, and it is argued here that none are. It seems strange to ignore the well-documented debate on that issue. Nick Gardner 14:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean here. The third sentence is the one quoting the UDHR. The article says no one would claim this right is absolute. The more general discussion belongs in the more general article. Peter Jackson 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Freedom_of_religion&oldid=840360"