Talk:Board game: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (Created page with "{{subpages}} == History == A site like "Astral City" is not a suitable reference for the history of games. Moreover, the "Royal Game of Ur" is a modern name attached to a board ...") |
imported>Peter Jackson |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The explanation of "board game" is also too simplistic. | The explanation of "board game" is also too simplistic. | ||
--[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Not very good, is it? There's Murray's ''History of Board Games Other Than Chess'', supplementing his ''History of Chess''. More recently there's a book called something like ''Oxford Guide to Board Games''. And, descriptive more than historical, Bell's ''Board and Table Games from Many Civilizations'', 2 volumes. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:50, 5 November 2011
History
A site like "Astral City" is not a suitable reference for the history of games. Moreover, the "Royal Game of Ur" is a modern name attached to a board found -- nothing about the (original) rules is known. For a history of early board games more and more precise information is needed. The explanation of "board game" is also too simplistic. --Peter Schmitt 00:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not very good, is it? There's Murray's History of Board Games Other Than Chess, supplementing his History of Chess. More recently there's a book called something like Oxford Guide to Board Games. And, descriptive more than historical, Bell's Board and Table Games from Many Civilizations, 2 volumes. Peter Jackson 10:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)